Law and Public Choice 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Law and Public Choice 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书著者简介

Law and Public Choice 电子书图书目录

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-12-22

Law and Public Choice 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

喜欢 Law and Public Choice 电子书的读者还喜欢

Law and Public Choice 电子书读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Univ of Chicago Pr

作者:Farber, Daniel A./ Frickey, Philip P.

出品人:

页数:176

译者:

出版时间:1991-1

价格:$ 22.60

装帧:Pap

isbn号码:9780226238036

丛书系列:

图书标签: 法学政治学公共选择

Law and Public Choice 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书图书描述

In "Law and Public Choice," Daniel Farber and Philip Frickey present a remarkably rich and accessible introduction to the driving principles of public choice. In this, the first systematic look at the implications of social choice for legal doctrine, Farber and Frickey carefully review both the empirical and theoretical literature about interest group influence and provide a nonmathematical introduction to formal models of legislative action. Ideal for course use, this volume offers a balanced and perceptive analysis and critique of an approach which, within limits, can illuminate the dynamics of government decision-making." "Law and Public Choice" is a most valuable contribution to the burgeoning literature. It should be of great interest to lawyers, political scientists, and all others interested in issues at the intersection of government and law."--Cass R. Sunstein, University of Chicago Law School

Law and Public Choice 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Law and Public Choice 2024 pdf epub mobi 用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

本书是对公共选择理论及其法律应用的修正。广义理论：基于阿罗定律（尤其是表决程序对结果的重要影响力），否认公共选择理论仅仅是把立法／民主过程看成是私人偏好的博弈，而部分地赞同republicanism，即立法者意识形态不可忽视，反过来修正偏好之博弈，从而使民主制度取得超越简单多数决的合法性。与讨论相关的是第四章对Scalia-Easterbrook（1）摈弃立法原意作为法律解释之一种的批判：现实地考察，立法史，尤其是委员会报告，不仅仅是职员加上利益团体的创作；委员会专业化“集权”处理的合理性；集合体沿着政治光谱做的决定，立法原意为最为接近中间观点的立法者的意见，并非不可琢磨；（2）完全抛弃进化解读的可能的批判：立法者可能受益也可能受损于进化解读，没有理由认为他们一定反对法官未来顺时势之解释。

评分☆☆☆☆☆