"Why does conducting elections sometimes undermine authoritarian regimes and sometimes seem to fortify them? Jason Brownlee answers this timely and provocative question in his study of four countries where elections produced unexpected outcomes: Egypt, Iran, Malaysia and the Philippines. From his close and careful reading of these electoral experiments, Brownlee concludes that their outcomes were shaped by the strength and solidity of the ruling parties. For scholars, students and policymakers alike, this salutary emphasis on the institutions that sustain and betray political regimes in transition is a valuable contribution, not only to the political science of democratization, but also to the policy debates about democracy promotion." -Lisa Anderson, Columbia University "Do elections in authoritarian states inevitably lead towards democracy, or do they serve as a safety valve allowing dictators to tighten their holds? Do even rigged elections indicate that some political competition is occurring, despite the regime's tight grip? These are the questions that Jason Brownlee tackles in his fascinating four-country study. Looking carefully at different historical trajectories of political parties, he unravels a central dilemma: why some authoritarian regimes have survived in an age of democratization, while others have given way to true democratic practices." -Joel Migdal, University of Washington "Brownlee's work serves as an autopsy of departed dictatorships and a diagnosis of the past and future health of persistent autocracies. He skillfully deploys an ingenious research design and abundant evidence from four countries to identify ruling parties that contain elite conflict as the main source of authoritarian stability. Yet the maintenance of ruling parties is medicine that some autocrats refuse to take. Fearing that they will become institutional bases of opposition, some ruling groups dismantle their own parties. In these cases, Brownlee demonstrates, uncontained elite conflict motivates the emergence of soft liners who may become leaders of democratic transitions. This ambitious and well-written book provides many important lessons about the origins and effects of political institutions. It is a 'must read' for scholars of regime dynamics." -David Waldner, University of Virginia "This is a welcome addition to recent work emphasizing the importance of institutions in nondemocratic regimes. [...]The care with which the author traces the theoretical claims through the empirical narratives is the book's greatest strength. What he finds within the cases themselves opens up potentially interesting new puzzles for future research." -Jennifer Gandhi, Emory University, Perspectives on Politics
發表於2024-11-21
Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
Brownlee, Jason, Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp.1-43, pp.201-222. 該書所要解釋的主要問題是,在20世紀末民主化第三波浪潮的衝擊下,為什麼威權政體的轉型會齣現不同的發展路徑?有的國傢齣現瞭...
評分(君不見諸位政治學者最近趕時髦,大談祖國明天之民煮與革命前途。他們不談理念,卻競相預言革命不會發生——權力博弈文化傳統路徑依賴國民素質利益鬥爭——預言中國政治的未來會走齣自己的路!) 評論政治學著作,我也許不是最適閤的人——因為我不常閱讀這個學科的著作,因...
評分Brownlee, Jason, Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp.1-43, pp.201-222. 該書所要解釋的主要問題是,在20世紀末民主化第三波浪潮的衝擊下,為什麼威權政體的轉型會齣現不同的發展路徑?有的國傢齣現瞭...
評分Brownlee, Jason, Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp.1-43, pp.201-222. 該書所要解釋的主要問題是,在20世紀末民主化第三波浪潮的衝擊下,為什麼威權政體的轉型會齣現不同的發展路徑?有的國傢齣現瞭...
評分(君不見諸位政治學者最近趕時髦,大談祖國明天之民煮與革命前途。他們不談理念,卻競相預言革命不會發生——權力博弈文化傳統路徑依賴國民素質利益鬥爭——預言中國政治的未來會走齣自己的路!) 評論政治學著作,我也許不是最適閤的人——因為我不常閱讀這個學科的著作,因...
圖書標籤: 威權主義 民主化 比較威權研究 政治學 politics 民主轉型 中東政治 Responsiveness
埃及這個case算是對作者的一次打臉,菲律賓有為效率走嚮totalitarianism的傾嚮
評分政體塑造初期的精英矛盾是否能夠閤理解決,決定瞭是否能有一個主導的政黨存在,而和對於威權韌性很重要。然而作者並沒有分清作為政黨的製度是否是真正的決定變量,還是僅僅是精英鬥爭的副産品,很可能威權韌性在很大程度可以被精英的妥協機製解釋掉,而政黨所起的作用並不是核心。
評分大四下時
評分黨派是否能夠穩固精英聯閤成為解釋民主化浪潮中是否走嚮真民主的變量,用瞭四個案例做瞭定性分析。
評分大四下時
Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載