Jennifer Nagel, Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Toronto
Jennifer Nagel is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Chair at the University of Toronto. Her research covers both historical and contemporary topics in epistemology. She has published on scepticism and empirical knowledge in Descartes and Locke and has also written a series of articles on intuitive ascriptions of knowledge.
发表于2024-12-22
Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
评分| 黄远帆 牛津通识系列丛书是一套知识普及类读物。作者通常是领域专家,他们通过深入浅出的方式,引领读者进入一个论题。这与“大家小书”的概念颇相契。哲学类读物于其中占有不少比重。既有以哲学家为主题的:尼采、哈贝马斯等;也有以议题为线索的:形上学、伦理学等;或是聚...
评分| 黄远帆 牛津通识系列丛书是一套知识普及类读物。作者通常是领域专家,他们通过深入浅出的方式,引领读者进入一个论题。这与“大家小书”的概念颇相契。哲学类读物于其中占有不少比重。既有以哲学家为主题的:尼采、哈贝马斯等;也有以议题为线索的:形上学、伦理学等;或是聚...
评分这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
评分这本书写得很烂,作者大量地使用插入语、引语,致使文章读起来磕磕巴巴,缺乏节奏感。 第五章写得很垃圾垃圾,害得我费了一天的时间琢磨。那些吹捧的人如果不服,我来摘一段话,你给我现场说说啥意思。 估计作者没啥水平!你能感觉得到文章逻辑的混乱。这本书是领域综述的定位...
图书标签: 哲学 知识论 牛津通识读本 方法论 VSI knowledge 英语 Oxford
Includes both historical and contemporary developments in the theory of knowledge
Expresses complex ideas in a clear and accessible way, using simple examples
Examines the relationship between knowledge and truth
Explores the central issues and debates in epistemology
Part of the bestselling Very Short Introductions series - over six million copies sold worldwide
What is knowledge? How does it differ from mere belief? Do you need to be able to justify a claim in order to count as knowing it? How can we know that the outer world is real and not a dream?
Questions like these are ancient ones, and the branch of philosophy dedicated to answering them - epistemology - has been active for thousands of years. In this thought-provoking Very Short Introduction, Jennifer Nagel considers these classic questions alongside new puzzles arising from recent discoveries about humanity, language, and the mind. Nagel explains the formation of major historical theories of knowledge, and shows how contemporary philosophers have developed new ways of understanding knowledge, using ideas from logic, linguistics, and psychology. Covering topics ranging from relativism and the problem of scepticism to the trustworthiness of internet sources, Nagel examines how progress has been made in understanding knowledge, using everyday examples to explain the key issues and debates
????
评分????
评分已经忘了书中关于知识的可靠性的论述。唯一有印象的是,当一个人说“我知道X如何如何”时,那隐含的意思是“X如何如何”是真的;而当一个人说“我认为Y如何如何”时,“Y如何如何”只是一种个人观点。
评分酣畅淋漓。 P.S.人生第一本读完的英文书。
评分简洁也太简单了。知识与事实相关联,但并非每一个事实都是知识的要件。大多数认识论学者的知识理论都是从单个的认知主体与事实之间的联系出发。knowledge links a subject to a truth,所以,knowledge与opinion的区别在它们那里的区分并不明显。Gettier时代的“知识”依旧被等同于被证实的真信念。而被证实的真信念依旧不能说是知识,后者超越于证言和真信念的总和。经典理论的困境,存在于正当理由与事实的鸿沟之间。最理想的状态就是找到一种知识理论,同时能够结合抽象和客观,也就是调和笛卡尔的第一人视角和洛克的第三人视角。
Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书