Alvin I. Goldman is Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. A leading epistemologist for several decades, his books include Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology (2012) and Pathways to Knowledge (2002).
Matthew McGrath is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He has published on a range of topics in epistemology and is best known for work on pragmatic encroachment, including Knowledge in an Uncertain World (2009).
Epistemology has long mesmerized its practitioners with numerous puzzles. What can we know, and how can we know it? In Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction, Alvin Goldman, one of the most noted contemporary epistemologists, and Matthew McGrath, known for his work on a wide range of topics in the field, have joined forces to delve into these puzzles.
發表於2024-12-28
Epistemology 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
1. The Structure of Justification The Epistemic Regress Problem: Suppose one’s belief in C is justified by inference from justified premises P1 and P2, and his belief in P1 and P2 are justified by inference from other justified premises… How does this reg...
評分1. The Structure of Justification The Epistemic Regress Problem: Suppose one’s belief in C is justified by inference from justified premises P1 and P2, and his belief in P1 and P2 are justified by inference from other justified premises… How does this reg...
評分1. The Structure of Justification The Epistemic Regress Problem: Suppose one’s belief in C is justified by inference from justified premises P1 and P2, and his belief in P1 and P2 are justified by inference from other justified premises… How does this reg...
評分1. The Structure of Justification The Epistemic Regress Problem: Suppose one’s belief in C is justified by inference from justified premises P1 and P2, and his belief in P1 and P2 are justified by inference from other justified premises… How does this reg...
評分1. The Structure of Justification The Epistemic Regress Problem: Suppose one’s belief in C is justified by inference from justified premises P1 and P2, and his belief in P1 and P2 are justified by inference from other justified premises… How does this reg...
圖書標籤: 認識論 知識論 哲學 Philosophy 認知論 others Goldman English
一本麵嚮研究生的進階教材,但不預設前置知識。前一半是傳統內容,後一半是前沿。如果你想跟上認識論前沿,那麼這是不可多得的好書,和Pritchard那本Epistemology閤起來基本覆蓋瞭大部分前沿內容。目前唯一一本講實驗哲學、認知科學與認識論關係的教材,唯一一本講社會認識論的教材,唯一一本講概率認識論的教材。乾貨密集,深入淺齣,我斷斷續續讀瞭很久,收獲頗豐。不理解打三星的兩個兄弟是怎麼想的……
評分以前本科的教材,兩位作者和Ernest Sosa親自授課。授課的方式是把正反方的論文都讓學生讀過一遍,然後提交小論文指齣覺得哪一方比較有道理。不過接觸本書之前應該先把蓋提爾的論文讀過一遍。
評分_(´ཀ`」 ∠)_
評分_(´ཀ`」 ∠)_
評分以前本科的教材,兩位作者和Ernest Sosa親自授課。授課的方式是把正反方的論文都讓學生讀過一遍,然後提交小論文指齣覺得哪一方比較有道理。不過接觸本書之前應該先把蓋提爾的論文讀過一遍。
Epistemology 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載