G. Cristina Mora is assistant professor of sociology at the University of California, Berkeley.
发表于2024-12-19
Making Hispanics 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 社会学 民族 历史
How did Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, and Cubans become known as “Hispanics” and “Latinos” in the United States? How did several distinct cultures and nationalities become portrayed as one? Cristina Mora answers both these questions and details the scope of this phenomenon in Making Hispanics. She uses an organizational lens and traces how activists, bureaucrats, and media executives in the 1970s and '80s created a new identity category—and by doing so, permanently changed the racial and political landscape of the nation.
Some argue that these cultures are fundamentally similar and that the Spanish language is a natural basis for a unified Hispanic identity. But Mora shows very clearly that the idea of ethnic grouping was historically constructed and institutionalized in the United States. During the 1960 census, reports classified Latin American immigrants as “white,” grouping them with European Americans. Not only was this decision controversial, but also Latino activists claimed that this classification hindered their ability to portray their constituents as underrepresented minorities. Therefore, they called for a separate classification: Hispanic. Once these populations could be quantified, businesses saw opportunities and the media responded. Spanish-language television began to expand its reach to serve the now large, and newly unified, Hispanic community with news and entertainment programming. Through archival research, oral histories, and interviews, Mora reveals the broad, national-level process that led to the emergence of Hispanicity in America.
胜在好的问题和详实的史料。theory也算清晰,但没有比较果然很难出彩,感觉在generalization上有所欠缺,以及从结果去推动机的思路还是不能完全站住脚。Census officials的动机是什么?这里说的有点模糊。
评分胜在好的问题和详实的史料。theory也算清晰,但没有比较果然很难出彩,感觉在generalization上有所欠缺,以及从结果去推动机的思路还是不能完全站住脚。Census officials的动机是什么?这里说的有点模糊。
评分胜在好的问题和详实的史料。theory也算清晰,但没有比较果然很难出彩,感觉在generalization上有所欠缺,以及从结果去推动机的思路还是不能完全站住脚。Census officials的动机是什么?这里说的有点模糊。
评分胜在好的问题和详实的史料。theory也算清晰,但没有比较果然很难出彩,感觉在generalization上有所欠缺,以及从结果去推动机的思路还是不能完全站住脚。Census officials的动机是什么?这里说的有点模糊。
评分胜在好的问题和详实的史料。theory也算清晰,但没有比较果然很难出彩,感觉在generalization上有所欠缺,以及从结果去推动机的思路还是不能完全站住脚。Census officials的动机是什么?这里说的有点模糊。
Making Hispanics 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书