Editors
Lars Bo Kaspersen, University of Copenhagen
Lars Bo Kaspersen trained as a sociologist and is now a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Copenhagen, where he teaches history, politics and sociology. His research interests are in the transformation of the welfare state, the sociology of war and civil society. His most recent book is Denmark in the World (2013).
Jeppe Strandsbjerg, Copenhagen Business School
Jeppe Strandsbjerg trained as a political scientist and is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Business and Politics at Copenhagen Business School. His research interests are in arctic geopolitics and the spatiality of the sovereign territorial state. He has published articles in several journals, including Geopolitics and the Journal of Power.
Contributors
Lars Bo Kaspersen, Jeppe Strandsbjerg, Benno Teschke, Thomas Ertman, Hendrik Spruyt, Philip Gorski, Vivek Sharma, Peter Haldén, Dietrich Jung, Robert H. Holden, Victoria Hui
Read more at http://www.cambridge.org/cn/academic/subjects/sociology/social-theory/does-war-make-states-investigations-charles-tillys-historical-sociology#t4eVFDAEq8uZTwRT.99
发表于2024-11-07
Does War Make States? 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 历史社会学 社会学 战争研究 蒂利 暴力-战争 政治社会学 比较政治 sociology
Arising from renewed engagement with Charles Tilly's canonical work on the relationship between war and state formation, this volume situates Tilly's work in a broader theoretical landscape and brings it into contemporary debates on state formation theory. Starting with Tilly's famous dictum 'war made the state, and the state made war', the book takes his claim further, examining it from a philosophical, theoretical and conceptual view, and asking whether it is applicable to non-European regions such as the Middle East, South America and China. The authors question Tilly's narrow view of the causal relationship between warfare and state-making, and use a positive yet critical approach to suggest alternative ways to explain how the state is formed. Readers will gain a comprehensive view of the most recent developments in the literature on state formation, as well as a more nuanced view of Charles Tilly's work.
晚近以来历史社会学学者对tilly thesis的检讨,论文水平参差不齐。但从整体上看,几位学者都将视野投向了中世纪制度遗产和国际秩序理解的丰富性对现代国家建构的影响,从而对bellicist theory有所动摇,不过Tilly的整体判断依然成立,对于自由主义的单薄理解提供了一个极为重要的修正。两篇关注概念理解和思想渊源的文章值五星,最后一篇真是一己之力将政治科学研究的所有毛病融会贯通,五毒俱全。
评分晚近以来历史社会学学者对tilly thesis的检讨,论文水平参差不齐。但从整体上看,几位学者都将视野投向了中世纪制度遗产和国际秩序理解的丰富性对现代国家建构的影响,从而对bellicist theory有所动摇,不过Tilly的整体判断依然成立,对于自由主义的单薄理解提供了一个极为重要的修正。两篇关注概念理解和思想渊源的文章值五星,最后一篇真是一己之力将政治科学研究的所有毛病融会贯通,五毒俱全。
评分晚近以来历史社会学学者对tilly thesis的检讨,论文水平参差不齐。但从整体上看,几位学者都将视野投向了中世纪制度遗产和国际秩序理解的丰富性对现代国家建构的影响,从而对bellicist theory有所动摇,不过Tilly的整体判断依然成立,对于自由主义的单薄理解提供了一个极为重要的修正。两篇关注概念理解和思想渊源的文章值五星,最后一篇真是一己之力将政治科学研究的所有毛病融会贯通,五毒俱全。
评分晚近以来历史社会学学者对tilly thesis的检讨,论文水平参差不齐。但从整体上看,几位学者都将视野投向了中世纪制度遗产和国际秩序理解的丰富性对现代国家建构的影响,从而对bellicist theory有所动摇,不过Tilly的整体判断依然成立,对于自由主义的单薄理解提供了一个极为重要的修正。两篇关注概念理解和思想渊源的文章值五星,最后一篇真是一己之力将政治科学研究的所有毛病融会贯通,五毒俱全。
评分晚近以来历史社会学学者对tilly thesis的检讨,论文水平参差不齐。但从整体上看,几位学者都将视野投向了中世纪制度遗产和国际秩序理解的丰富性对现代国家建构的影响,从而对bellicist theory有所动摇,不过Tilly的整体判断依然成立,对于自由主义的单薄理解提供了一个极为重要的修正。两篇关注概念理解和思想渊源的文章值五星,最后一篇真是一己之力将政治科学研究的所有毛病融会贯通,五毒俱全。
Does War Make States? 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书