Alenka Zupančič, a Slovenian psychoanalytic theorist and philosopher, teaches at the European Graduate School and is a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and the Arts. She is the author of The Shortest Shadow: Nietzsche's Philosophy of the Two and The Odd One In: On Comedy, both in the Short Circuits series, published by the MIT Press.
Why sexuality is at the point of a "short circuit" between ontology and epistemology.
Consider sublimation -- conventionally understood as a substitute satisfaction for missing sexual satisfaction. But what if, as Lacan claims, we can get exactly the same satisfaction that we get from sex from talking (or writing, painting, praying, or other activities)? The point is not to explain the satisfaction from talking by pointing to its sexual origin, but that the satisfaction from talking is itself sexual. The satisfaction from talking contains a key to sexual satisfaction (and not the other way around) -- even a key to sexuality itself and its inherent contradictions. The Lacanian perspective would make the answer to the simple-seeming question, "What is sex?" rather more complex. In this volume in the Short Circuits series, Alenka Zupančič approaches the question from just this perspective, considering sexuality a properly philosophical problem for psychoanalysis; and by psychoanalysis, she means that of Freud and Lacan, not that of the kind of clinician practitioners called by Lacan "orthopedists of the unconscious."
Zupančič argues that sexuality is at the point of a "short circuit" between ontology and epistemology. Sexuality and knowledge are structured around a fundamental negativity, which unites them at the point of the unconscious. The unconscious (as linked to sexuality) is the concept of an inherent link between being and knowledge in their very negativity.
發表於2024-11-23
What IS Sex 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 精神分析 英文版 哲學 哲學 英文 性/彆 Lacan 2017
從拉康與馬剋思的混閤處反思崇高與滿足感的關係。在精神分析與哲學的接閤處反身性思考滿足的替代與替代滿足。滿足是欲望的終點嗎?高潮真的能夠到達嗎?言談、繪畫、祈禱真的能夠令人滿足嗎?他們的本體是性欲的嗎?
評分從拉康與馬剋思的混閤處反思崇高與滿足感的關係。在精神分析與哲學的接閤處反身性思考滿足的替代與替代滿足。滿足是欲望的終點嗎?高潮真的能夠到達嗎?言談、繪畫、祈禱真的能夠令人滿足嗎?他們的本體是性欲的嗎?
評分澄清精神分析對性與性差的理解,可與Badiou、Cassin關於L'Etourdit的論辯對讀。個人最感興趣的是Zupančič在女性主義視野下對性與政治、否定性與關係性的重估,雖然沒有直接對話酷兒理論,但為其提示瞭一個方嚮,即對弗洛伊德-拉康主義脈絡下的反社會論題(對Bersani、Edelman的誤稱?)作齣更細緻的限定與拓進,超越“否定性/反關係”vs.“烏托邦/關係性”這對固化的二元。
評分從拉康與馬剋思的混閤處反思崇高與滿足感的關係。在精神分析與哲學的接閤處反身性思考滿足的替代與替代滿足。滿足是欲望的終點嗎?高潮真的能夠到達嗎?言談、繪畫、祈禱真的能夠令人滿足嗎?他們的本體是性欲的嗎?
評分不怎麼樣。把性理解為一種本體論和認識論層麵上的“激進否定性”(absolute negativity)本身並沒有任何激進之處。對於性的建構論的反駁建立在自身空洞的政治效用上。這一立場在盲目為性差公式背書時顯得尤為可笑。
What IS Sex 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載