Alenka Zupančič, a Slovenian psychoanalytic theorist and philosopher, teaches at the European Graduate School and is a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and the Arts. She is the author of The Shortest Shadow: Nietzsche's Philosophy of the Two and The Odd One In: On Comedy, both in the Short Circuits series, published by the MIT Press.
发表于2024-12-22
What IS Sex 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 精神分析 英文版 哲學 哲学 英文 性/别 Lacan 2017
Why sexuality is at the point of a "short circuit" between ontology and epistemology.
Consider sublimation -- conventionally understood as a substitute satisfaction for missing sexual satisfaction. But what if, as Lacan claims, we can get exactly the same satisfaction that we get from sex from talking (or writing, painting, praying, or other activities)? The point is not to explain the satisfaction from talking by pointing to its sexual origin, but that the satisfaction from talking is itself sexual. The satisfaction from talking contains a key to sexual satisfaction (and not the other way around) -- even a key to sexuality itself and its inherent contradictions. The Lacanian perspective would make the answer to the simple-seeming question, "What is sex?" rather more complex. In this volume in the Short Circuits series, Alenka Zupančič approaches the question from just this perspective, considering sexuality a properly philosophical problem for psychoanalysis; and by psychoanalysis, she means that of Freud and Lacan, not that of the kind of clinician practitioners called by Lacan "orthopedists of the unconscious."
Zupančič argues that sexuality is at the point of a "short circuit" between ontology and epistemology. Sexuality and knowledge are structured around a fundamental negativity, which unites them at the point of the unconscious. The unconscious (as linked to sexuality) is the concept of an inherent link between being and knowledge in their very negativity.
不怎么样。把性理解为一种本体论和认识论层面上的“激进否定性”(absolute negativity)本身并没有任何激进之处。对于性的建构论的反驳建立在自身空洞的政治效用上。这一立场在盲目为性差公式背书时显得尤为可笑。
评分从拉康与马克思的混合处反思崇高与满足感的关系。在精神分析与哲学的接合处反身性思考满足的替代与替代满足。满足是欲望的终点吗?高潮真的能够到达吗?言谈、绘画、祈祷真的能够令人满足吗?他们的本体是性欲的吗?
评分澄清精神分析对性与性差的理解,可与Badiou、Cassin关于L'Etourdit的论辩对读。个人最感兴趣的是Zupančič在女性主义视野下对性与政治、否定性与关系性的重估,虽然没有直接对话酷儿理论,但为其提示了一个方向,即对弗洛伊德-拉康主义脉络下的反社会论题(对Bersani、Edelman的误称?)作出更细致的限定与拓进,超越“否定性/反关系”vs.“乌托邦/关系性”这对固化的二元。
评分澄清精神分析对性与性差的理解,可与Badiou、Cassin关于L'Etourdit的论辩对读。个人最感兴趣的是Zupančič在女性主义视野下对性与政治、否定性与关系性的重估,虽然没有直接对话酷儿理论,但为其提示了一个方向,即对弗洛伊德-拉康主义脉络下的反社会论题(对Bersani、Edelman的误称?)作出更细致的限定与拓进,超越“否定性/反关系”vs.“乌托邦/关系性”这对固化的二元。
评分最终还是回到爱情那了,发明新能指……
What IS Sex 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书