Peter Ho is Chair Professor of Chinese Economy and Development and Director of the European Research Council (ERC) Project on Land Policy and Administration in China . Ho has extensively published on institutions and property rights, sustainable and rural development, poverty and social inequality, and environmental policy and management in China. He published widely in the leading SSCI/SCI-rated journals of Development and Environmental Studies with impact factors ranging from 3.0 to 8.25. Furthermore, Peter Ho has published over 10 books amongst which with Oxford University Press, Routledge, and Blackwell Publishers. Ho is concurrently seconded to the Ford Foundation in Beijing, where he oversees the grant-making in the program on sustainable development in China.
Prior to taking up his current post Peter Ho has served as Chair Professor for nearly 10 years. First, as Chair Professor of International Development Studies and Director of the Centre for Development Studies at Groningen University (1648), and subsequently as Chair Professor of Chinese Economy and Development at the University of Leiden (1575) and Director of its Modern East Asia Research Centre.
In recognition of his scientific achievements, Prof. Ho was awarded the prestigious Independent Research Grant as Consolidator by the European Research Council (ERC). This highly competitive prize of 1.5 million Euros targets the top scientists within the European Union. The ERC Review Panel noted about Prof. Ho that he: “is a world renowned scholar with an impressive set of publications and awards to his name” while his achievements and publications “show great intellectual capacity and creativity” (ERC Review Report, 2011).
Peter Ho has initiated and supervised large-scale projects with a total budget of over 4.5 million Euro. His projects have been personally supported by the Vice-Chairman of the National People’s Congress of China and the Dutch Minister for Development Cooperation, and were visited by the Chinese Vice-Minister of Land and Resources, and the Dutch Minister of Spatial Planning and Environment.
Peter Ho acts as advisor to members of the Chinese government and the Dutch Cabinet, including the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. He has served on various commissions as a scientific advisor for the OECD, the EU, international corporations and banks.
China's urban sprawl has led to serious social cleavages. Unclear land and property rights have resulted in an uneasy alliance between real estate companies and local authorities, with most willing to strike illegal deals over land. The results have been devastating. Farmers live in fear that the land they till today will be gone tomorrow, while urban citizens are regularly evicted from their homes to make way for new skyscrapers and highways. These shocking incidents underscore the urgency of the land question in China. The recent conviction of the Chinese Minister for Land Resources and the forced evictions that have led to the injury and death of ordinary Chinese citizens highlight the case for land reform. Against this backdrop, many scholars criticize China's lack of privatization and titling of property. This monograph, however, demonstrates that these critically depend on timing and place. Land titling is imperative for the wealthier regions, yet, may prove detrimental in areas with high poverty. The book argues that China's land reform can only succeed if the clarification of property rights is done with caution and ample regard for regional variations.
發表於2024-12-22
Institutions in Transition 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
本書是在2008年9月齣版的《誰是中國土地的擁有者》(第一版)的基礎上修訂後齣版的。當時,這本書的定價是39元,2014年10月齣版的第二版,定價48元,我以36元買入,從價格上看,感覺時光倒流,物有所值。總的來說,這是一本很不錯的書,僅書名就很吸引人。作者何·皮特(Peter ...
評分土地在中國自古至今都起著重要的作用,影響著民生,影響著國傢的發展,更影響著政權的穩定。本書的突齣之處在於使用瞭“可信度”和“空製度”兩個概念。一種為社會群體所信賴並確認為可信的製度,其創生在相當程度上取決於該群體根據其所麵臨的社會經濟和政治因素所做齣的選擇...
評分對這本書的興趣來自於傢裏,爺爺繼承瞭一片山林,有50年代當地政府和法院的書麵證明(審判書),之後被劃歸自然保護區,卻一直對産權的補償問題沒有明確說法。 所以書名是吸引的主要原因,書裏對建國以來的土地製度變遷有清晰和獨到的分析和解讀,多少讓我有些沉迷。特彆是對...
評分對這本書的興趣來自於傢裏,爺爺繼承瞭一片山林,有50年代當地政府和法院的書麵證明(審判書),之後被劃歸自然保護區,卻一直對産權的補償問題沒有明確說法。 所以書名是吸引的主要原因,書裏對建國以來的土地製度變遷有清晰和獨到的分析和解讀,多少讓我有些沉迷。特彆是對...
評分這本書最大的亮點就是以一個荷蘭學者的身份來描述中國的土地製度問題,書中涉及到農地産權、草原管理、森林權等等,作者經過在中國的深入調查研究,對中國土地問題的認識十分深刻,對我們研究土地問題提供瞭新的思路。
圖書標籤: 政治經濟學 property 中國政治 rights, institution 海外中國研究 比較政治經濟學 政治學
在研究中國土地問題的地理學者裏,Peter Ho是少有的有曆史感的人,比如他討論瞭集體化時代的六十條,介紹瞭1990年代中期迫於社會穩定壓力中止的土地登記確權(沒錯就是今年一號文件要大力推進的那個),我覺得這一點就足以顯現他的價值。但是也有一些問題,比如對曆史材料的占有和分析並不算充分,以及討論土地問題過於意識形態化,等等。
評分在研究中國土地問題的地理學者裏,Peter Ho是少有的有曆史感的人,比如他討論瞭集體化時代的六十條,介紹瞭1990年代中期迫於社會穩定壓力中止的土地登記確權(沒錯就是今年一號文件要大力推進的那個),我覺得這一點就足以顯現他的價值。但是也有一些問題,比如對曆史材料的占有和分析並不算充分,以及討論土地問題過於意識形態化,等等。
評分在研究中國土地問題的地理學者裏,Peter Ho是少有的有曆史感的人,比如他討論瞭集體化時代的六十條,介紹瞭1990年代中期迫於社會穩定壓力中止的土地登記確權(沒錯就是今年一號文件要大力推進的那個),我覺得這一點就足以顯現他的價值。但是也有一些問題,比如對曆史材料的占有和分析並不算充分,以及討論土地問題過於意識形態化,等等。
評分在研究中國土地問題的地理學者裏,Peter Ho是少有的有曆史感的人,比如他討論瞭集體化時代的六十條,介紹瞭1990年代中期迫於社會穩定壓力中止的土地登記確權(沒錯就是今年一號文件要大力推進的那個),我覺得這一點就足以顯現他的價值。但是也有一些問題,比如對曆史材料的占有和分析並不算充分,以及討論土地問題過於意識形態化,等等。
評分在研究中國土地問題的地理學者裏,Peter Ho是少有的有曆史感的人,比如他討論瞭集體化時代的六十條,介紹瞭1990年代中期迫於社會穩定壓力中止的土地登記確權(沒錯就是今年一號文件要大力推進的那個),我覺得這一點就足以顯現他的價值。但是也有一些問題,比如對曆史材料的占有和分析並不算充分,以及討論土地問題過於意識形態化,等等。
Institutions in Transition 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載