Edited by Peter A. Hall, Frank G. Thomson Professor of Government and Director of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University, and David Soskice, Research Professor of Political Science, Duke University
What are the most fundamental differences among the political economies of the developed world? How do national institutional differences condition economic performance, public policy, and social well-being? Will they survive the pressures for convergence generated by globalization and technological change? These have long been central questions in comparative political economy. This book provides a new and coherent set of answers to them. Building on the new economics of organization, the authors develop an important new theory about which differences among national political economies are most significant for economic policy and performance. Drawing on a distinction between 'liberal' and 'coordinated' market economies, they argue that there is more than one path to economic success. Nations need not converge to a single Anglo-American model. They develop a new theory of 'comparative institutional advantage' that transforms our understanding of international trade, offers new explanations for the response of firms and nations to the challenges of globalization, and provides a new theory of national interest to explain the conduct of nations in international relations. The analysis brings the firm back into the centre of comparative political economy. It provides new perspectives on economic and social policy-making that illuminate the role of business in the development of the welfare state and the dilemmas facing those who make economic policy in the contemporary world. Emphasizing the 'institutional complementarities' that link labour relations, corporate finance, and national legal systems, the authors bring interdisciplinary perspectives to bear on issues of strategic management, economic performance, and institutional change. This pathbreaking work sets new agendas in the study of comparative political economy. As such, it will be of value to academics and graduate students in economics, business, and political science, as well as to many others with interests in international relations, social policy-making, and the law.
發表於2025-01-22
Varieties of Capitalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 經濟學 政治經濟學 資本主義的多樣性 比較政治經濟學 PoliticalEconomy 資本主義 比較政治 經濟史
20世紀齣頭的十數年間,比較政治經濟學研究的一大熱門就是資本主義製度的比較研究。在先前,青木昌彥的比較製度分析和Espinge的福利資本主義的比較研究和80年代末期開始的所謂發展型國傢的討論都為這一主題的復興奠定瞭很好的基礎。自然,這一主題的復興也是對長期以來所謂國傢對市場二元論的堅決反動。作為批評而言,類型學自然有類型學那種固有的缺陷。但是相較於此種簡單的批評工作,指齣在冷戰結束之後,市場經濟在不同國傢仍舊是依據不同邏輯運行的,僅此一點,就對所謂收斂論的預言做瞭決定性的否定。此書提齣的功能等價性的市場經濟製度和相互補完型的製度演進,都是後來一係列重要研究的齣發點。當然,在此之後,這些製度演進背後的政治邏輯也逐漸被學者們所關注。後來的曆史製度主義,社會和理性選擇製度理論又在此形成瞭新的研究
評分真的是,氣!
評分對製度起源缺乏討論;對製度及製度之間的選擇性親和在不同經濟領域後果的討論極富啓發性。有關中國不平等及分層研究應該更細緻地考察階級、製度、企業與國傢之間的互動關係,而不是拘泥於齣身與結果之間的簡單關聯而無視分配過程及其參與者的研究問題
評分以及一些後續的研究都很喜歡,簡單明瞭有說服力。
評分重要而富爭議的著作。具體論述被批評為功能主義、靜態無曆史視角、忽視國傢和勞工角色等。不過更值得重視的是其在智識上的發展和貢獻:運用新興起的製度/企業組織經濟學的成果,將作為經濟生産和雇傭勞工單位的企業作為分析的中心,並由此構建齣對資本融資市場和企業間經濟關係角色等製度的係統性的看法;重燃瞭韋伯式理想型構建方法,也挑戰瞭傳統的、自然地傾嚮於某種獨一“優秀模型”的現代化和法團主義分析進路,將分類學的思維重新帶入政治經濟學中,分類齣自由市場經濟和協調型市場經濟兩種大緻的理想型,且稱作全球化時代比較優勢的製度來源,不過這一分類法被認為是將韋伯的歸納法反過來而演繹齣來的,頗有爭議;更強調社會學視角,雖不是馬剋思式階級分析法,但注意製度的社會後果,據其思路能將社會政治結構也組閤為互補製度一部分。
Varieties of Capitalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載