Networks are forms of organization characterized by voluntary, reciprocal, and horizontal patterns of communication and exchange. Their ability to generate information quickly and accurately, and deploy it effectively, is their most valuable currency. The u...
评分Networks are forms of organization characterized by voluntary, reciprocal, and horizontal patterns of communication and exchange. Their ability to generate information quickly and accurately, and deploy it effectively, is their most valuable currency. The u...
评分Networks are forms of organization characterized by voluntary, reciprocal, and horizontal patterns of communication and exchange. Their ability to generate information quickly and accurately, and deploy it effectively, is their most valuable currency. The u...
评分Networks are forms of organization characterized by voluntary, reciprocal, and horizontal patterns of communication and exchange. Their ability to generate information quickly and accurately, and deploy it effectively, is their most valuable currency. The u...
评分Networks are forms of organization characterized by voluntary, reciprocal, and horizontal patterns of communication and exchange. Their ability to generate information quickly and accurately, and deploy it effectively, is their most valuable currency. The u...
感觉有点空洞。主要探讨的还是TANs怎么操作以及为什么能有效果的问题。但总给人一种“一群正义的积极分子从天而降把第三世界国家的坏蛋政府和坏蛋跨国公司都给治了”的印象,说这些人能够给世行和IMF带来压力迫使其改变政策,可能多少也有些夸大其词。作者认为TANs不是新自由主义的传声筒,而是真正体现了“沟通理性”的精神。可就像哈贝马斯理论本身对于讨论权力不平等问题几乎无所作为一样,这样的经验研究也让人极度怀疑。我并不想太过极端地说 TANs只不过是西方再生产霸权的一种方式,但是这些组织从哪里取得资源,他们和当地的民众怎样互动,普遍的人权观念如何在特定的环境下得以推行,都是些重要的问题。我觉得这书unpack得还不够。
评分Advocacy networks
评分一本连book review都乏善可陈的书是有多难看~如果要讲structuralist直接看国关的书不就好了吗。选int'l development方向的同学真是痛苦。
评分Advocacy networks
评分这里面专门有一节,撇清了跟GS的区别:老纸是混子,不想搞个社会。。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有