From Philosophy to Philology

Benjamin Elman (Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania, 1980) is Professor of East Asian Studies and History with his primary department in East Asian Studies. His teaching and research fields include: 1) Chinese intellectual and cultural history, 1000-1900; 2) history of science in China, 1600-1930; 3) history of education in late imperial China; 4) Sino-Japanese cultural history, 1600-1850. His publications include: From Philosophy To Philology (1984, 1990, 2001); Classicism, Politics, and Kinship (1990); A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (2000). He has recently completed two book projects: On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900 (2005), and A Cultural History of Modern Science in Late Imperial China (2006). A new work entitled Meritocracy and Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (HUP) is forthcoming in fall 2013. He is also currently editing several volumes from conferences held at Princeton under the auspices of PIIRS, EAP, and the Mellon Foundation on "Science in Republican China," "Languages, Literacies, and Vernaculars in Early Modern East Asia," and "Medical Classics and Medical Philology in East Asian, 1400-1900." During his leave in AY14, Elman will visit archives in China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea. His previous sabbatical leave in 2007-2008 was supported by a research fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies.” Since then he has continued working on a new project entitled "The Intellectual Impact of Late Imperial Chinese Classicism, Medicine, and Science in Tokugawa Japan, 1700-1850," under the auspices of summer research grants from the Chiang Ching Kuo Foundation in Taiwan and the Mellon Foundation.

出版者:Univ of California Los Angeles

作者:Benjamin A. Elman

页数:364

出版时间:2001-9-1

价格:GBP 38.63

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9781883191047

丛书系列:UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series

图书标签:思想史海外中国研究Elman历史海外漢學經學社会史清學

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

From Philosophy to Philology is an indispensable work on the intellectual life of China’s literati in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. While there was not a scientific revolution in China, there was an intellectual one. The shock of the Manchu conquest and the collapse of the Ming dynasty in 1644 led to a rejection of the moral self-cultivation that dominated intellectual life under the Ming. China’s scholars, particularly in the Yangzi River Basin, sought to restore China’s greatness by recapturing the wisdom of the ancients from the Warring States period (403–221 B.C.) and the Former Han dynasty (202 B.C.–9 A.D.), much as Renaissance Europe rediscovered the Greeks and Romans. But in China scholars faced the daunting task of determining which of many editions of the Classics were the true originals and which were forged additions of later centuries.

The ensuing search for authentic texts led to the founding of academies and libraries, the compiling of bibliographies, the rise of printing of editions of the Classics and Histories and commentaries on their components, the study of ancient inscriptions, and a two-hundred-year effort to discover and discard forged texts. In the process rigorous standards of scholarly training were adopted, and scholarship became a full-time profession distinct from gentry farmers or imperial officials.

读后感

就如译文所示，这是一本有关“中华帝国晚期思想与社会”面面观式的综述性论著，作者运用了“库恩的‘科学共同体’和福柯的‘话语’理论”以及“综汇学术史、社会史与一体的研究方法”（这一方法就被称为“欧美最近出现的新文化史方法”，也即是风靡一时的知识社会学），探讨了...

六月第一周，读艾尔曼《从理学到朴学》与《经学、政治和宗族》二书，写得都非常好看。以知识社会学为方法来写的书，其实都很丰富有趣。由于两书名气甚大，都知道这是知识社会学治汉学的经典，所以我这里只谈一些细微的感受。 《从理学到朴学》，最精彩的是三四五章。研究了考...  

一直以来都对汉学家比较感兴趣，但是也限于自身读的他们的书比较少，所以一直未敢对之进行评析。这次借着读完从图书管里借来的艾尔曼的两本书（另一本是《经学、政治和宗族 : 中华帝国晚期常州今文学派研究》）的机会，也大体的说一下我对于汉学家的看法。 从他们研究...  

就如译文所示，这是一本有关“中华帝国晚期思想与社会”面面观式的综述性论著，作者运用了“库恩的‘科学共同体’和福柯的‘话语’理论”以及“综汇学术史、社会史与一体的研究方法”（这一方法就被称为“欧美最近出现的新文化史方法”，也即是风靡一时的知识社会学），探讨了...

六月第一周，读艾尔曼《从理学到朴学》与《经学、政治和宗族》二书，写得都非常好看。以知识社会学为方法来写的书，其实都很丰富有趣。由于两书名气甚大，都知道这是知识社会学治汉学的经典，所以我这里只谈一些细微的感受。 《从理学到朴学》，最精彩的是三四五章。研究了考...  

用户评价

专业英语什么的……

清代尤其是18世紀學術轉變的內部動因及整個學術機制的變革。很必讀的作品，看完感覺很多繪畫史上的轉變都好理解多了。

精细，专业，大师。

从未想过魏源康有为等人与考证派千丝万缕的联系。抛开所有学术话语，只有一种感想，那时的人们想象这个世界的方式与今天是多么不同啊。而一旦进了窠臼，就难跳出了。

《何处是江南》以及《权力的毛细管作用》多多少少算是对这本书的回应/批判性继承？