Benjamin Elman (Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania, 1980) is Professor of East Asian Studies and History with his primary department in East Asian Studies. His teaching and research fields include: 1) Chinese intellectual and cultural history, 1000-1900; 2) history of science in China, 1600-1930; 3) history of education in late imperial China; 4) Sino-Japanese cultural history, 1600-1850. His publications include: From Philosophy To Philology (1984, 1990, 2001); Classicism, Politics, and Kinship (1990); A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (2000). He has recently completed two book projects: On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900 (2005), and A Cultural History of Modern Science in Late Imperial China (2006). A new work entitled Meritocracy and Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (HUP) is forthcoming in fall 2013. He is also currently editing several volumes from conferences held at Princeton under the auspices of PIIRS, EAP, and the Mellon Foundation on "Science in Republican China," "Languages, Literacies, and Vernaculars in Early Modern East Asia," and "Medical Classics and Medical Philology in East Asian, 1400-1900." During his leave in AY14, Elman will visit archives in China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea. His previous sabbatical leave in 2007-2008 was supported by a research fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies.” Since then he has continued working on a new project entitled "The Intellectual Impact of Late Imperial Chinese Classicism, Medicine, and Science in Tokugawa Japan, 1700-1850," under the auspices of summer research grants from the Chiang Ching Kuo Foundation in Taiwan and the Mellon Foundation.
From Philosophy to Philology is an indispensable work on the intellectual life of China’s literati in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. While there was not a scientific revolution in China, there was an intellectual one. The shock of the Manchu conquest and the collapse of the Ming dynasty in 1644 led to a rejection of the moral self-cultivation that dominated intellectual life under the Ming. China’s scholars, particularly in the Yangzi River Basin, sought to restore China’s greatness by recapturing the wisdom of the ancients from the Warring States period (403–221 B.C.) and the Former Han dynasty (202 B.C.–9 A.D.), much as Renaissance Europe rediscovered the Greeks and Romans. But in China scholars faced the daunting task of determining which of many editions of the Classics were the true originals and which were forged additions of later centuries.
The ensuing search for authentic texts led to the founding of academies and libraries, the compiling of bibliographies, the rise of printing of editions of the Classics and Histories and commentaries on their components, the study of ancient inscriptions, and a two-hundred-year effort to discover and discard forged texts. In the process rigorous standards of scholarly training were adopted, and scholarship became a full-time profession distinct from gentry farmers or imperial officials.
發表於2025-01-31
From Philosophy to Philology 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
本書內容雖好,但翻譯問題多多,這已是海外漢學係列的通病。有關引用文獻的部分更是重災區,漏譯、錯譯、引錯都有不少。直接看“參考書目”部分。 P204 埃剋(Tsen Yu-ho Ecke)《中國書法》 按:英文當為(Tseng Yu-ho Ecke),即曾佑和,現為美國夏威夷火努魯魯藝術學院顧問...
評分 評分從明到清,學術話語發生瞭一次巨大的轉變,理學在被極大打擊過後,異變成瞭以考據為核心的樸學,江南學術群體通過親緣、地域等聯係,形成瞭一群學術派係,他們在編修四庫的時候就選擇與自己學術觀點相同的書籍,從而為之後學術研究發展的私傢化做瞭鋪墊。考據是義理的最終裁定...
評分曾經因為給學生上課,去校對瞭中譯本,發現錯誤很多,尤其是論述的地方,有些地方甚至是嚴重影響原意的。校本不在手邊,否則可以好好列齣來。
評分本書內容雖好,但翻譯問題多多,這已是海外漢學係列的通病。有關引用文獻的部分更是重災區,漏譯、錯譯、引錯都有不少。直接看“參考書目”部分。 P204 埃剋(Tsen Yu-ho Ecke)《中國書法》 按:英文當為(Tseng Yu-ho Ecke),即曾佑和,現為美國夏威夷火努魯魯藝術學院顧問...
圖書標籤: 思想史 海外中國研究 Elman 曆史 海外漢學 經學 社會史 清學
專業英語什麼的……
評分《何處是江南》以及《權力的毛細管作用》多多少少算是對這本書的迴應/批判性繼承?
評分專業英語什麼的……
評分專業英語什麼的……
評分重讀加星。雖然有不足,但是在那個年代把這個框架做成這樣真是很不容易瞭。
From Philosophy to Philology 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載