In recent years, libertarian impulses have increasingly influenced national and economic debates, from welfare reform to efforts to curtail affirmative action. Murray N. Rothbard's classic The Ethics of Liberty stands as one of the most rigorous and philosophically sophisticated expositions of the libertarian political position.
What distinguishes Rothbard's book is the manner in which it roots the case for freedom in the concept of natural rights and applies it to a host of practical problems. An economist by profession, Rothbard here proves himself equally at home with philosophy. And while his conclusions are radical—that a social order that strictly adheres to the rights of private property must exclude the institutionalized violence inherent in the state—his applications of libertarian principles prove surprisingly practical for a host of social dilemmas, solutions to which have eluded alternative traditions.
The Ethics of Liberty authoritatively established the anarcho-capitalist economic system as the most viable and the only principled option for a social order based on freedom. This edition is newly indexed and includes a new introduction that takes special note of the Robert Nozick-Rothbard controversies.
Murray N. Rothbard, a scholar of extraordinary range, made major contributions to economics, history, political philosophy, and legal theory. He developed and extended the Austrian economics of Ludwig von Mises, in whose seminar he was a main participant for many years. He established himself as the principal Austrian theorist in the latter half of the twentieth century and applied Austrian analysis to historical topics such as the Great Depression of 1929 and the history of American banking.
Rothbard was no ivory-tower scholar, interested only in academic controversies. Quite the contrary, he combined Austrian economics with a fervent commitment to individual liberty. He developed a unique synthesis that combined themes from nineteenth-century American individualists such as Lysander Spooner and Benjamin Tucker with Austrian economics. A new political philosophy was the result, and Rothbard devoted his remarkable intellectual energy, over a period of some forty-five years, to developing and promoting his style of libertarianism. In doing so, he became a major American public intellectual.
文/田君潇 【引言】20世纪上半叶是实证主义理论泛滥的时代,政治哲学在当时也几乎沦落到无人问津的地步。如果说罗尔斯《正义论》的问世将政治哲学重新拉回人们的视野,那么罗斯巴德的经典《自由的伦理》就是政治哲学研究复兴中最具创造性的成就。汉斯-赫尔曼·霍普在该书的导...
评分这一章, 貌似秦晖的支持者、或者批评"秦晖的批评者"者,可以引用。 。。。自由主义社会的基本准则:任何人不得侵犯他人的合法或合理享有的财产。 所有现存于任何时空的私有财产都应视为有效,并应当保护其免受侵犯。这实际上是功利主义的自由市场经济学家一贯看待财产权...
评分(书读到一半时写的书评) 有人曾用诺齐克的理论来谴责中国的强拆现象。但《无政府、国家与乌托邦》一书对于中国这种转型期财产问题没说多少,因为诺齐克只为历史清白的私产权辩护。诺齐克不仅仅对中国无话可说。实际上,目前全世界没有什么地方的财产权是像诺齐克想象的那样...
评分http://headsalon.org/archives/4666.html 罗斯巴德批判#1:自然法与上帝 罗斯巴德批判#2:自然法与“人的本质” 罗斯巴德批判#3:理性?谁的理性? 罗斯巴德批判#4:虚构的进步,分裂的本质 罗斯巴德批判#5:就你科学,就你客观 罗斯巴德批判#6:鲁滨逊的自由和权利 罗斯巴德...
评分财产权,是指人们对财产占有、转让、享用其收益的权利。既然是一种权利,也就意味着不容侵犯,意味着人们甚至可以用暴力来保卫它。换句话说,在财产权面临威胁时,人们使用暴力是正当的。当然,在非紧急状态下,暴力是由国家机器来实施的。 财产权应该享有这种地位吗...
终于看完了,读起来比较吃力,尤其是涉及哲学论证的部分。窝嚼着以后还会再读的,现在很多还是一知半解
评分没解决我政府是如何为什么运作的问题,不过这书就是指导参与民主的啊,粗略看过,道理都懂。
评分民主政治和公民权利的ABC
评分终于看完了,读起来比较吃力,尤其是涉及哲学论证的部分。窝嚼着以后还会再读的,现在很多还是一知半解
评分从当年的民主百问改编的
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有