How do we see the world around us? The Penguin on Design series includes the works of creative thinkers whose writings on art, design and the media have changed our vision forever.
Susan Sontag’s groundbreaking critique of photography asks forceful questions about the moral and aesthetic issues surrounding this art form. Photographs are everywhere. They have the power to shock, idealize or seduce, they create a sense of nostalgia and act as a memorial, and they can be used as evidence against us or to identify us. In six incisive essays, Sontag examines the ways in which we use these omnipresent images to manufacture a sense of reality and authority in our lives.
How do we see the world around us? "The Penguin on Design" series includes the works of creative thinkers whose writings on art, design and the media have changed our vision forever. Susan Sontag's groundbreaking critique of photography asks forceful questions about the moral and aesthetic issues surrounding this art form. Photographs are everywhere. They have the power to shock, idealize or seduce, they create a sense of nostalgia and act as a memorial, and they can be used as evidence against us or to identify us. In six incisive essays, Sontag examines the ways in which we use these omnipresent images to manufacture a sense of reality and authority in our lives.
这篇读后感很难下笔,我能写什么呢?论《论摄影》?这是个冷笑话。 《论摄影》是一本很难读的书,我拖拖拉拉的看了一个多月,最后还是没能看完。有人表示黄灿然的译文读起来晦涩难懂,立刻被群众喷得狗血淋头,于是我怕怕的闭嘴,只恨自己的理解能力有限,学术水平...
评分尽管拍照和开枪在英文里都是Shoot,但当我看到桑塔格把相机比喻为枪支,仍不免有些惊讶。在桑塔格看来,越来越多的人可能会使用相机取代枪支来满足自己侵略和掠夺的欲望,而被对准的那方也许不情愿,也许不知情,更不知道自己其实是被当作了享乐的对象。 桑塔格是一位享誉全球...
评分《论摄影》 苏珊•桑塔格 黄灿然 译 上海译文出版社 ISBN 978-7-5327-4410-7 照片在教导我们新的视觉准则的同时,也改变并扩大我们对什么才值得看和我们有权利去看什么的观念。 照片篡改世界的规模,但照片本身也被缩减、被放大、被裁剪、被修饰、被窜改、被装扮。它们衰老...
评分"知识分子热衷于讨论摄影的意义,于是摄影师按下快门的手越来越犹疑,这种情况发展下去,可能导致摄影两极分化,到最后只剩下两种人:新闻摄影师和哲学家。"(赫尔穆特.纽顿) ◎闭眼的方式 "人们为事物拍照是为了将其赶出心中,我的故事则是一种闭眼的方式。"(卡夫卡) ...
评分首先,插入一句,长乐路之男(上海)同学认为关于此书“编者懒惰得没有插入一幅摄影家的作品” ,是一大遗憾,我觉得很可笑。这书的英文原版也没有任何摄影作品的,这么说是不是作者susan本人太懒惰了呢? 我当初最开始在书店翻这书的时候,其实偏偏它通篇一张照片都没有...
桑塔格在对比“工业社会”与“非工业社会”的时候,不免有些东方主义吧。同样的简化也存在于她对中国的讨论中。很明显,她是通过一种既定的过滤系统来看非西方世界的。很好奇这本1977年出版的书于海德格尔1977年发表的World Picture的文章之间的关系。个人认为本书中的观点不是很新。基本没有离开巴赞1960年那篇the ontology of photographic image的影子。萨义德的东方主义1978年出版,时间差是桑塔格唯一的脱罪证明。
评分To photograph people is to violate them, by seeing them as they never see themselves, by having knowledge of them that they can never have; it turns people into objects that can be symbolically possessed. Just as a camera is a sublimation of the gun, to photograph someone is a subliminal murder - a soft murder, appropriate to a sad, frightened time
评分不是她的文字风格的粉丝。快速读了,大致是:翻来倒去,主体客体。Subject, Object, their relationship is Non-intervention. (当时还没有PS)
评分对西方摄影以及理论看得还不多 只知道Weston Adams布勒松和Atget这些人 所以没有context理解起来有点儿困难。Sontag的critical thinking值得学习! 总而言之就是没有看太懂但是还是很有收获
评分对西方摄影以及理论看得还不多 只知道Weston Adams布勒松和Atget这些人 所以没有context理解起来有点儿困难。Sontag的critical thinking值得学习! 总而言之就是没有看太懂但是还是很有收获
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有