A challenging and polemical argument about the Autonomia movement in Italy, a group of Italian intellectuals who produced a powerful and rigorous critique of capitalism and work in the 1960s and '70s, and its intersections with two of the most radical architectural-urban theorists of the day: Aldo Rossi and Archizoom. The Project of Autonomy introduces English-speaking readers to major figures like Mario Tronti and Raniero Panzieri who have previously been little known here, especially in an architectural context; and draws on significant new source material, including recent interviews by the author and untranslated material. Finally, the book includes beautiful illustrations related to the context of these intellectual and architectural movements, with reproductions of rare publications of the 1960s as well as seminal projects and exhibitions. A part of the FORuM Project Publication series published in association with the Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture at Columbia University.
具体描述
读后感
用户评价
Aureli的勇气挺鼓舞人的，无可为而为之的精神棒极了。读关于Rossi的分析，三点：1. Rossi的自主性与美国的那些强调学科自主是不一样的，2 Rossi与Tafuli之间的自主性，一个积极介入，一个消极批判，前者希望有一个political subject的状态存在于资本主义中，3 A的思考和写作似乎就是想要扛起意大利知识分子历史责任。 P63论述Rossi的Locus蕴含的separateness in terms of political reading完全就是Aureli在那本后来absolute form书中的理论逻辑基础。
评分@2017-10-18 20:34:51
评分Tafri, Rossi, Archizoom,60s是怎样一个时代。。
评分Aureli的勇气挺鼓舞人的，无可为而为之的精神棒极了。读关于Rossi的分析，三点：1. Rossi的自主性与美国的那些强调学科自主是不一样的，2 Rossi与Tafuli之间的自主性，一个积极介入，一个消极批判，前者希望有一个political subject的状态存在于资本主义中，3 A的思考和写作似乎就是想要扛起意大利知识分子历史责任。 P63论述Rossi的Locus蕴含的separateness in terms of political reading完全就是Aureli在那本后来absolute form书中的理论逻辑基础。
评分建筑理论真的不适合纯文字的表达方式，一篇essay就够了，别动不动就写书
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有