From the late 1970s onward, serious art photography began to be made at large scale and for the wall. Michael Fried argues that this immediately compelled photographers to grapple with issues centering on the relationship between the photograph and the viewer standing before it that until then had been the province only of painting. Fried further demonstrates that certain philosophically deep problems - associated with notions of theatricality, literalness, and objecthood, and touching on the role of original intention in artistic production, first discussed in his contro-versial essay "Art and Objecthood" (1967) - have come to the fore once again in recent photography. This means that the photo-graphic "ghetto" no longer exists; instead photography is at the cutting edge of contemporary art as never before.Among the photographers and video-makers whose work receives serious attention in this powerfully argued book are Jeff Wall, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Cindy Sherman, Thomas Struth, Thomas Ruff, Andreas Gursky, Luc Delahaye, Rineke Dijkstra, Patrick Faigenbaum, Roland Fischer, Thomas Demand, Candida Hofer, Beat Streuli, Philip-Lorca diCorcia, Douglas Gordon and Philippe Parreno, James Welling, and Bernd and Hilla Becher. Future discussions of the new art photography will have no choice but to take a stand for or against Fried's conclusions.
發表於2024-12-27
Why Photography Matters as Art as Never Before 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
我們希望攝影是什麼?迴應邁剋爾·弗雷德《巴特的刺點》[1] 文 | 詹姆斯·埃爾金斯 譯 | It 雖然邁剋爾·弗雷德接受在他之前對刺點(punctum)的理解,[2]但不妨說,刺點已是近期攝影理論中最常被誤用的兩個術語之一[另一個是查爾斯·皮爾斯(Charles Peirce)的指示性概念[3]]...
評分我們希望攝影是什麼?迴應邁剋爾·弗雷德《巴特的刺點》[1] 文 | 詹姆斯·埃爾金斯 譯 | It 雖然邁剋爾·弗雷德接受在他之前對刺點(punctum)的理解,[2]但不妨說,刺點已是近期攝影理論中最常被誤用的兩個術語之一[另一個是查爾斯·皮爾斯(Charles Peirce)的指示性概念[3]]...
評分我們希望攝影是什麼?迴應邁剋爾·弗雷德《巴特的刺點》[1] 文 | 詹姆斯·埃爾金斯 譯 | It 雖然邁剋爾·弗雷德接受在他之前對刺點(punctum)的理解,[2]但不妨說,刺點已是近期攝影理論中最常被誤用的兩個術語之一[另一個是查爾斯·皮爾斯(Charles Peirce)的指示性概念[3]]...
評分我們希望攝影是什麼?迴應邁剋爾·弗雷德《巴特的刺點》[1] 文 | 詹姆斯·埃爾金斯 譯 | It 雖然邁剋爾·弗雷德接受在他之前對刺點(punctum)的理解,[2]但不妨說,刺點已是近期攝影理論中最常被誤用的兩個術語之一[另一個是查爾斯·皮爾斯(Charles Peirce)的指示性概念[3]]...
評分我們希望攝影是什麼?迴應邁剋爾·弗雷德《巴特的刺點》[1] 文 | 詹姆斯·埃爾金斯 譯 | It 雖然邁剋爾·弗雷德接受在他之前對刺點(punctum)的理解,[2]但不妨說,刺點已是近期攝影理論中最常被誤用的兩個術語之一[另一個是查爾斯·皮爾斯(Charles Peirce)的指示性概念[3]]...
圖書標籤: 攝影 攝影理論 當代藝術 藝術史 Photography Michael.Fried 藝術理論 藝術史(西方)
為畢業論文,讀的老子吠血
評分讀瞭Jeff Wall的三章,論如何用海德格爾和維特根斯坦寫(cou)評(zi)論(shu)
評分隻讀瞭其中一章。。
評分隻讀瞭其中一章。。
評分為畢業論文,讀的老子吠血
Why Photography Matters as Art as Never Before 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載