Arunabh Ghosh is associate professor of history at Harvard University.
发表于2024-12-22
Making It Count 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 历史 海外中国研究 统计学 政治学 中国研究 中国 Ghosh_Arunabh CHINA
In 1949, at the end of a long period of wars, one of the biggest challenges facing leaders of the new People’s Republic of China was how much they did not know. The government of one of the world’s largest nations was committed to fundamentally reengineering its society and economy via socialist planning while having almost no reliable statistical data about their own country. Making It Count is the history of efforts to resolve this “crisis in counting.” Drawing on a wealth of sources culled from China, India, and the United States, Arunabh Ghosh explores the choices made by political leaders, statisticians, academics, statistical workers, and even literary figures in attempts to know the nation through numbers.
Ghosh shows that early reliance on Soviet-inspired methods of exhaustive enumeration became increasingly untenable in China by the mid-1950s. Unprecedented and unexpected exchanges with Indian statisticians followed, as the Chinese sought to learn about the then-exciting new technology of random sampling. These developments were overtaken by the tumult of the Great Leap Forward (1958–61), when probabilistic and exhaustive methods were rejected and statistics was refashioned into an ethnographic enterprise. By acknowledging Soviet and Indian influences, Ghosh not only revises existing models of Cold War science but also globalizes wider developments in the history of statistics and data.
Anchored in debates about statistics and its relationship to state building, Making It Count offers fresh perspectives on China’s transition to socialism.
重读了一下第八章。有个细节上的错误。把刘的调查方法当做毛的调查方法的一种并不妥。两者可能都是典型调查,但它们其实是相互竞争的,毕竟工作队和调查会的调查展开模式不一样。
评分重读了一下第八章。有个细节上的错误。把刘的调查方法当做毛的调查方法的一种并不妥。两者可能都是典型调查,但它们其实是相互竞争的,毕竟工作队和调查会的调查展开模式不一样。
评分期待已久的Ghosh博士论文,终于见书。书名Making it Count(算数)一语双关,国家只有会“算数”(statistics)才能让其政策“算数”(statecraft)。而这也就意味着,冰冷的统计数字背后其实是变动不居的“统计政治学”:从苏式的全面统计(exhaustive),到夭折的印度式随机统计(stochastic),再到great leap forward时期复兴的毛式定点调查(ethnographic),Ghosh的新著都有详尽梳理。往上承接Tong Lam讨论民国的A Passion for Facts, 往下则使人重思“大数据热”,甚至是当下疫情中的统计谜团。【不禁感慨一下,Madeleine Zelin门下真是英才辈出】
评分重读了一下第八章。有个细节上的错误。把刘的调查方法当做毛的调查方法的一种并不妥。两者可能都是典型调查,但它们其实是相互竞争的,毕竟工作队和调查会的调查展开模式不一样。
评分期待已久的Ghosh博士论文,终于见书。书名Making it Count(算数)一语双关,国家只有会“算数”(statistics)才能让其政策“算数”(statecraft)。而这也就意味着,冰冷的统计数字背后其实是变动不居的“统计政治学”:从苏式的全面统计(exhaustive),到夭折的印度式随机统计(stochastic),再到great leap forward时期复兴的毛式定点调查(ethnographic),Ghosh的新著都有详尽梳理。往上承接Tong Lam讨论民国的A Passion for Facts, 往下则使人重思“大数据热”,甚至是当下疫情中的统计谜团。【不禁感慨一下,Madeleine Zelin门下真是英才辈出】
Making It Count 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书