Guobin Yang is an associate professor in the Department of Asian and Middle Eastern Cultures at Barnard College, Columbia University. He has a Ph.D. in sociology from New York University and is coeditor, with Ching Kwan Lee, of Re-envisioning the Chinese Revolution: The Politics and Poetics of Collective Memories in Reform China.
Since the mid-1990s, the Internet has revolutionized popular expression in China, enabling users to organize, protest, and influence public opinion in unprecedented ways. Despite efforts to control these activities, online activism has been an agent of immense social change, allowing common citizens to disseminate content and openly challenge the authority of political and economic elites.
Guobin Yang’s pioneering study follows the rise of this dynamic protest and the forces that keep it relevant and unique. Online activism encompasses an innovative range of rituals, genres, and styles, and state efforts to constrain it have only led to more creative acts of subversion. Internet businesses have encouraged these contentious activities, generating an unusual synergy between capitalism and civil organizations that sponsor critique. Based on ten years of meticulous research and grounded in theories of social movements and the public sphere, Yang’s study emphasizes the mutual shaping of technology and society and highlights the important role of a transnational diaspora in the making of a Chinese Internet culture. In conclusion, Yang argues that online activism reflects important structural changes in contemporary China and points to a new era of informational politics.
哎,怎么说呢,可能是来到了一个更专制的时代吧,所以之前听说了杨老师书里的结论,对之就不是很认同,因为最近要做相关的文献,找来看了一下,果然比较失望。 简要的说几点自己的批评。 总的来说,这是每一块儿都很重要,但是在每一块谈的都很一般的书。 首...
评分approach:social movement, politics, partly cultural studies 目的:通过对Online activism的分析,来理解中国社会结构变化中的抗争与控制。 分析框架:多元互动 multi-interactionism (state, culture, civil society, market, transnational ) 优点: 1. 如本书开头...
评分算是打开了研究视野
评分the book offers rich information, but the explanations and interpretations on the phenomena are not solid.
评分描述和介绍多,解释和探究少。
评分杨国斌教授写的。
评分为什么“过时”的批评是不适宜用在这本书(或者这类书)上?引用我导师的话...这些研究体现了当互联网刚出生时期的样貌。而我认为其中有几章的理论和概念提出地特别得好。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有