A review of 200 or 300 words cannot do justice to a book like this: it is the summation of a great critic's most fundamental beliefs--something like a dying Bernstein's last performance of Mahler's ninth, though in this case a lot less sad. In fact, this book of essays represents Bloom at his most celebratory, and there's a wonderful, vigorous energy about it. Why, one wonders, reading it, do we bother reading anybody but Shakespeare, Dante, or Chaucer? The argument for Shakespeare is particularly compelling. Bloom believes that Shakespeare is the canon: that he defines for the Western world the standards by which we judge all literature. And more: he defines for us what we are ourselves, what we understand of human nature. This argument, offered with Bloom's customary flare for the controversial, is akin to the remark that all philosophy is a footnote to Plato, and like it, is probably in large measure true. Thus, modern psychology doesn't add very much to what people could have already learned from reading Shakespeare because Shakespeare defines the limits of what we know: we can't get beyond or outside him. Certainly, experience teaches that Bloom is right; indeed, the evolution of human consciousness seems to have taken one of its periodic jolts forward about the time of Shakespeare, and he above all seems to have captured the entire scope of what was new. As Bloom points out, Shakespeare is universally adored, in all languages, and perhaps it is for this reason. The essays on Dante and Chaucer are almost equally powerful, though in a sense less awesome. And the brief remarks about the powerful movements of resentment trying to push apart these great pillars of the Western canon, though perspicacious, are melancholy and incidental. Get this book for the great essays on Shakespeare. For lovers of literature, probably nothing more powerful or in an odd way more religious will be written this year. Stuart Whitwell --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
哈罗德·布鲁姆,1930年出生于纽约,先后就读于康奈尔大学和耶鲁大学,1955年起在耶鲁大学任教。早期研究浪漫主义诗歌,曾出版过论布莱克、雪莱、叶芝、斯蒂文斯等英美诗人的专著。除先前提到《影响的焦虑》、《西方正典》之外,他还著有《误读之图》、《卡巴拉犹太神秘哲学与批评》、《诗与隐抑》以及即将出版的新作《耶稣和亚维:神圣之名》(Jesus and Yahweh:The Names Divine)。作为一个批评家,布鲁姆主要研究领域包括诗歌批评、理论批评和宗教批评三大方面,而英国浪漫主义诗歌、后期弗洛伊德的精神分析理论和犹太教的诺斯替主义与喀巴拉主义则是这些批评的主要对象。在美国,布鲁姆绝对算得上是一个大牌的学者和批评家。他以其独特的理论建构和批评实践被誉为是“西方传统中最有天赋、最有原创性和最具煽动性的一位文学批评家”。
技术的发展和商业的繁荣带给人类一种虚骄、狂傲的自信:似乎历史的进步恰如时光之箭,永远向前。我们坚信自己正日复一日毋庸置疑也不容争辩地在不断进步着。现代科技与商业联手造就的各种光怪陆离的奇幻(感官)体验,让人目眩神迷;前所未有的信息传递的便捷,又让人不...
评分2005-11-14 南方都市报 图书诊室 一号对象 《西方正典》中译本 鉴定:此书一方面没有注释,加上译名不规范,很多时候读者都猜不出书里讲的是谁以及是什么书。还有很多一望可知的错漏比前几年出版的文学理论书要多出很多,这与这本书的重要性有些不...
评分布鲁姆开宗明义就说了女性主义、后殖民主义、马克思主义以及结构/解构主义、符号学、形式主义盛行的文学批评环境下,让文学离开语境分析,不必刻意否认“欧洲白人男性作家”的霸权身份,也不必因为他们歧视女性就要因着某些字句大书特书——这样都损害了文学。布鲁姆认为,文学...
评分关于文学的语境,值得一谈的大概有三个层次。 在第一层次上,文学依赖于文本之外的语境。 到此为止,“纯”的文学还不存在。 大多数中世纪的东方文学都是应酬性的,这一点适用于从阿拉伯到中国的整个亚洲大陆——或许印度除外。对一位古代阿拉伯或波斯诗人来说,诗歌是展...
评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有