Steven Levy這部經典力作的25周年版從20世紀50年代早期跨越到80年代後期,追述瞭計算機革命中初期黑客的豐功偉績,他們都是最聰明和最富有個性的精英。他們勇於承擔風險,勇於挑戰規則,並把世界推嚮瞭一個全新的發展方嚮。本書更新瞭一些著名黑客的最新資料,包括比爾·蓋茨、馬剋·紮剋伯格、理查德·斯托曼和史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞剋,並講述瞭從早期計算機研究實驗室到最初的傢用計算機期間一些妙趣橫生的故事。
在Levy的筆下,他們都是聰明而勤奮的人,他們極富想象力,他們另闢蹊徑,發現瞭計算機工程問題的巧妙解決方案。他們都有一個共同的價值觀,那就是至今仍然長盛不衰的“黑客道德”。本書描述瞭近代曆史上的一個萌芽時期,描述瞭黑客用默默無聞的行動為當今的數字世界照亮瞭一條道路,描述瞭那些打破陳規“非法”訪問穿孔卡片計算機的MIT的學生,也描述瞭締造齣Altair和Apple II電腦這些偉大産品的DIY文化。
This 25th anniversary edition of Steven Levy's classic book traces the exploits of the computer revolution's original hackers -- those brilliant and eccentric nerds from the late 1950s through the early '80s who took risks, bent the rules, and pushed the world in a radical new direction. With updated material from noteworthy hackers such as Bill Gates, Mark Zukerberg, Richard Stallman, and Steve Wozniak, Hackers is a fascinating story that begins in early computer research labs and leads to the first home computers. Levy profiles the imaginative brainiacs who found clever and unorthodox solutions to computer engineering problems. They had a shared sense of values, known as "the hacker ethic," that still thrives today. Hackers captures a seminal period in recent history when underground activities blazed a trail for today's digital world, from MIT students finagling access to clunky computer-card machines to the DIY culture that spawned the Altair and the Apple II.
Amazon.com Exclusive: The Rant Heard Round the World
By Steven Levy
Author Steven Levy When I began researching Hacker s--so many years ago that it’s scary--I thought I’d largely be chronicling the foibles of a sociologically weird cohort who escaped normal human interaction by retreating to the sterile confines of computers labs. Instead, I discovered a fascinating, funny cohort who wound up transforming human interaction, spreading a culture that affects our views about everything from politics to entertainment to business. The stories of those amazing people and what they did is the backbone of Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution .
But when I revisited the book recently to prepare the 25th Anniversary Edition of my first book, it was clear that I had luckily stumbled on the origin of a computer (and Internet) related controversy that still permeates the digital discussion. Throughout the book I write about something I called The Hacker Ethic, my interpretation of several principles implicitly shared by true hackers, no matter whether they were among the early pioneers from MIT’s Tech Model Railroad Club (the Mesopotamia of hacker culture), the hardware hackers of Silicon Valley’s Homebrew Computer Club (who invented the PC industry), or the slick kid programmers of commercial game software. One of those principles was “Information Should Be Free.” This wasn’t a justification of stealing, but an expression of the yearning to know more so one could hack more. The programs that early MIT hackers wrote for big computers were stored on paper tapes. The hackers would keep the tapes in a drawer by the computer so anyone could run the program, change it, and then cut a new tape for the next person to improve. The idea of ownership was alien.
This idea came under stress with the advent of personal computers. The Homebrew Club was made of fanatic engineers, along with a few social activists who were thrilled at the democratic possibilities of PCs. The first home computer they could get their hands on was 1975’s Altair, which came in a kit that required a fairly hairy assembly process. (Its inventor was Ed Roberts, an underappreciated pioneer who died earlier this year.) No software came with it. So it was a big deal when 19-year-old Harvard undergrad Bill Gates and his partner Paul Allen wrote a BASIC computer language for it. The Homebrew people were delighted with Altair BASIC, but unhappy that Gates and Allen charged real money for it. Some Homebrew people felt that their need for it outweighed their ability to pay. And after one of them got hold of a “borrowed” tape with the program, he showed up at a meeting with a box of copies (because it is so easy to make perfect copies in the digital age), and proceeded to distribute them to anyone who wanted one, gratis.
This didn’t sit well with Bill Gates, who wrote what was to become a famous “Letter to Hobbyists,” basically accusing them of stealing his property. It was the computer-age equivalent to Luther posting the Ninety-Five Theses on the Castle Church. Gate’s complaints would reverberate well into the Internet age, and variations on the controversy persist. Years later, when another undergrad named Shawn Fanning wrote a program called Napster that kicked off massive piracy of song files over the Internet, we saw a bloodier replay of the flap. Today, issues of cost, copying and control still rage--note Viacom’s continuing lawsuit against YouTube and Google. And in my own business—journalism--availability of free news is threatening more traditional, expensive new-gathering. Related issues that also spring from controversies in Hackers are debates over the “walled gardens” of Facebook and Apple’s iPad.
I ended the original Hackers with a portrait of Richard Stallman, an MIT hacker dedicated to the principle of free software. I recently revisited him while gathering new material for the 25th Anniversary Edition of Hackers , he was more hard core than ever. He even eschewed the Open Source movement for being insufficiently noncommercial.
When I spoke to Gates for the update, I asked him about his 1976 letter and the subsequent intellectual property wars. “Don’t call it war,” he said. “Thank God we have an incentive system. Striking the right balance of how this should work, you know, there's going to be tons of exploration.” Then he applied the controversy to my own situation as a journalism. “Things are in a crazy way for music and movies and books,” he said. “Maybe magazine writers will still get paid 20 years from now. Who knows? Maybe you'll have to cut hair during the day and just write articles at night.”
So Amazon.com readers, it’s up to you. Those who have not read Hackers, , have fun and be amazed at the tales of those who changed the world and had a hell of time doing it. Those who have previously read and loved Hackers , replace your beat-up copies, or the ones you loaned out and never got back, with this beautiful 25th Anniversary Edition from O’Reilly with new material about my subsequent visits with Gates, Stallman, and younger hacker figures like Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook. If you don’t I may have to buy a scissors--and the next bad haircut could be yours! Read Bill Gates' letter to hobbyists
很久以前我還年輕得沒有意識到自己有多年輕的時候,那時會電腦就等於會用五筆字型,我最崇拜的人是比爾蓋茨。原因可能是他是世界首富。崇拜久瞭,就感覺自己可能是電腦天纔。 好不容易考上個重點高中,要求老爸的奬勵我一個電腦,我算是縣城裏幸福的孩子,於是老爸花瞭6000多塊...
評分每個愛上編程的人,都會對以下這段有共鳴。 p49 "The thing that got Slug into computers in the first place was the feeling of power you got from running the damn things. You can tell the computer what to do, and it fights with you, but it finally does what yo...
評分解決瞭一個很大的睏惑,從60年代一直到當代可以媲美當時阿波羅計劃的iphone,計算機都有哪些變化。 正如製造一座通天塔可能是裏程碑,但更難的是將其變成一個普適性的工具帶給所有的普羅大眾。30年間天賦異稟個性鮮明的黑客努力不可或缺。 同樣伴隨著計算機産業的不斷升級(...
評分從文學的角度看,這本書不值得去看!但是作為一本講述計算機黑客發展的書籍,確實值得每個打算在計算機的道路上走下去的人去看,因為他的每一章都能給你以巨大的鼓舞和推動力,也能夠讓你從曆史中發現黑客的價值和意義,增加你的職業榮譽感!如果你是一個計算機專業的人,我想...
評分今年暑假,無意中完成瞭一條推理鏈。然後,如同感召一般,這本書伴隨著這條道路擺在瞭我麵前。 矛盾源自有限,而人對信息與資源遵從瞭不同的分配關係,對於資源而言,人與之的關係是“占據”,所以資源是有限的;而對於信息而言,人可以“共享”。由這個意義上而言,信息,具...
早期的計算機文化,曾經的革命現在看來多少有些平淡。
评分相比Walter Isaacson的Innovators這批人更小眾一些。遊戲時代那批人真有意思。但是,最後蹦齣一段“RMS是最後的黑客”是個什麼鬼。
评分Hacker 這個行當裏的人,不會有一個是迫於生計來的。
评分那一段神奇的曆史...
评分應該是看瞭幾本IT史和沃茲傳之後看的
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有