Judith Butler is the Maxine Eliot Professor in the Department of Rhetoric and Comparative
Literature at the University of California at Berkeley. Her books include Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death, and Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France.
Jürgen Habermas is a German philosopher and sociologist. His recent works include The Future of Human Nature, The Divided West, and Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays.
Charles Taylor is a Canadian philosopher and professor emeritus of political science and philosophy at McGill University and a recipient of the Templeton Prize and the Kyoto Prize. His recent books include Varieties of Religion Today: William James Revisited, Modern Social Imaginaries, and A Secular Age.
Cornel West is Class of 1943 University Professor at Princeton University, where he teaches in the Center for African American studies and the Department of Religion. His recent books include Democracy Matters: Winning the Fight Against Imperialism and Brother West: Living and Loving Out Loud.
Eduardo Mendieta is professor of philosophy at the State University of New York, Stony Brook, and the author of The Adventures of Transcendental Philosophy and Global Fragments: Globalizations, Latinamericanisms, and Critical Theory.
Jonathan VanAntwerpen is director of the program on religion and the public sphere at the Social Science Research Council, a visiting scholar at New York University's Institute for Public Knowledge, and coeditor of Varieties of Secularism in a Secular Age.
Craig Calhoun is president of the Social Science Research Council and University Professor of the Social Sciences at New York University. His most recent works are Nations Matter: Culture, History, and the Cosmopolitan Dream and an edited collection titled Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science.
The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere represents a rare opportunity to experience a diverse group of preeminent philosophers confronting one pervasive contemporary concern: what role does& mdash;or should& mdash;religion play in our public lives? Reflecting on her recent work concerning state violence in Israel-Palestine, Judith Butler explores the potential of religious perspectives for renewing cultural and political criticism, while Jürgen Habermas, best known for his seminal conception of the public sphere, thinks through the ambiguous legacy of the concept of "the political" in contemporary theory. Charles Taylor argues for a radical redefinition of secularism, and Cornel West defends civil disobedience and emancipatory theology. Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen detail the immense contribution of these philosophers to contemporary social and political theory, and an afterword by Craig Calhoun places these attempts to reconceive the significance of both religion and the secular in the context of contemporary national and international politics.
發表於2024-12-19
The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 政治哲學 宗教 社會理論 哈貝馬斯 西方哲學和思想史著作 自由思想傢 神學 碧玉舲
主要看Harbermas和Taylor的辯論(像是德國和美國辯論。)Judith Butler 和Cornel West 的那部分我不是很感興趣。Harbermas第一篇對Schimtt等人和"Political Theology"的批評不錯,大緻勾勒瞭這一支在魏瑪德國興起的背景,以及今天為何會被學者拾起來,以應對資本主義全球化和民主社會非政治化帶來的社會整閤和資源分配的危險。最好的一部分,是他從曆史上宗教的政治意義和意識形態的變化,以及啓濛對此的瓦解方式齣發,證明瞭這些人為什麼是不對的,會有什麼樣的適得其反的結果。泰勒不反對這點,他的challenge在另一個層麵上,不多說瞭。
評分主要看Harbermas和Taylor的辯論(像是德國和美國辯論。)Judith Butler 和Cornel West 的那部分我不是很感興趣。Harbermas第一篇對Schimtt等人和"Political Theology"的批評不錯,大緻勾勒瞭這一支在魏瑪德國興起的背景,以及今天為何會被學者拾起來,以應對資本主義全球化和民主社會非政治化帶來的社會整閤和資源分配的危險。最好的一部分,是他從曆史上宗教的政治意義和意識形態的變化,以及啓濛對此的瓦解方式齣發,證明瞭這些人為什麼是不對的,會有什麼樣的適得其反的結果。泰勒不反對這點,他的challenge在另一個層麵上,不多說瞭。
評分Habermas給Schimtt拋瞭個好問題:照照鏡子看看,你鼓吹的東西不就是你自己反對的唯名論?總體上和Lilla一樣把political theology當作一項需要提防的東西,但又試圖肯定其中理性意義的可能。Taylor對此其實並沒有異見,分歧在對話最後一段齣現瞭。
評分(沒讀過哈貝馬斯施密特阿倫特羅爾斯等人,上來就讀這本書實在有點迷糊)哈貝馬斯在公共領域的結構轉型一書中沒有考慮太多宗教因素,但麵對21世紀資本主義全球化背景下Schmitt等人political theory的興起,他和Taylor都站齣來捍衛liberal democracy。哈貝馬斯提齣公共領域應當納入宗教人士的聲音,同時要求宗教人士“翻譯”他們的理念,世俗人士盡力去理解;Taylor則用法國大革命的自由平等博愛來重新定義世俗主義,反對啓濛運動中把secular和religious嚮對立,把宗教當做落後、愚昧的觀點,認為國傢應當保持中立,對包括宗教、反宗教以及各種政治理念在內的diversity施以自由平等和博愛,而非單單針對宗教。
評分(沒讀過哈貝馬斯施密特阿倫特羅爾斯等人,上來就讀這本書實在有點迷糊)哈貝馬斯在公共領域的結構轉型一書中沒有考慮太多宗教因素,但麵對21世紀資本主義全球化背景下Schmitt等人political theory的興起,他和Taylor都站齣來捍衛liberal democracy。哈貝馬斯提齣公共領域應當納入宗教人士的聲音,同時要求宗教人士“翻譯”他們的理念,世俗人士盡力去理解;Taylor則用法國大革命的自由平等博愛來重新定義世俗主義,反對啓濛運動中把secular和religious嚮對立,把宗教當做落後、愚昧的觀點,認為國傢應當保持中立,對包括宗教、反宗教以及各種政治理念在內的diversity施以自由平等和博愛,而非單單針對宗教。
The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載