Associate Professor and Honors Program Director at Northwestern University
PhD, Yale University
Professor Winters specializes on oligarchs and elites spanning a range of historical and contemporary cases, including ancient Athens and Rome, medieval Europe, the United States, as well as Indonesia, Singapore, and the Philippines. His new book, entitled Oligarchy, was published by Cambridge University Press in 2011. His research, publications, and teaching focus on the areas of comparative and international political economy, as well as comparative politics generally. Important themes in his work in addition to oligarchy include state-capital relations, capital mobility and the structural power of investors, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and the World Bank, human rights, authoritarianism, and democratic transitions in post-colonial states. He has conducted extensive research in the region of Southeast Asia.
His first book, Power in Motion: Capital Mobility and the Indonesian State (Cornell University Press, 1996), explores the highly undemocratic structural power of those who control the investment resources everyone else depends upon for their survival. With Jonathan Pincus, he co-edited Reinventing the World Bank (Cornell University Press, 2002), a wide-ranging critique of the Bank's structure and operation. In this volume Winters explores the problem of "criminal debt," especially in the Indonesian context. Both books were translated into Indonesian and published in Jakarta. He has also published two other books in Indonesian: in 1999, Dosa-Dosa Politik Orde Baru [Political Sins of Suharto's New Order], the best-selling book in Indonesia that year, and, in 2004, Orba Jatuh, Orba Bertahan? [Indonesia's "New Order" Falls or Endures?]. With co-author Prof. Ben Page, he wrote "Oligarchy in the United States?" which appeared in Perspectives on Politics in 2009.
For centuries, oligarchs were viewed as empowered by wealth, an idea muddled by elite theory early in the twentieth century. The common thread for oligarchs across history is that wealth defines them, empowers them, and inherently exposes them to threats. The existential motive of all oligarchs is wealth defense. How they respond varies with the threats they confront, including how directly involved they are in supplying the coercion underlying all property claims, and whether they act separately or collectively. These variations yield four types of oligarchy: warring, ruling, sultanistic, and civil. Oligarchy is not displaced by democracy but rather is fused with it. Moreover, the rule of law problem in many societies is a matter of taming oligarchs. Cases studied in this book include the United States, ancient Athens and Rome, Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, medieval Venice and Siena, mafia commissions in the United States and Italy, feuding Appalachian families, and early chiefs cum oligarchs dating from 2300 BCE.
發表於2024-11-21
Oligarchy 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
政治學上經典的政體分類,往往以亞裏士多德的“人數多寡+以公利/私利為本進行統治”為標準進行;在這種分類中,寡頭製被認為是“少數人以私利為本”而進行統治的政體。但Jeffrey Winters在此書中提齣瞭一種大膽的重新定義:寡頭是以高度財富集中為權力基礎、以保衛財富為主要政...
評分政治學上經典的政體分類,往往以亞裏士多德的“人數多寡+以公利/私利為本進行統治”為標準進行;在這種分類中,寡頭製被認為是“少數人以私利為本”而進行統治的政體。但Jeffrey Winters在此書中提齣瞭一種大膽的重新定義:寡頭是以高度財富集中為權力基礎、以保衛財富為主要政...
評分政治學上經典的政體分類,往往以亞裏士多德的“人數多寡+以公利/私利為本進行統治”為標準進行;在這種分類中,寡頭製被認為是“少數人以私利為本”而進行統治的政體。但Jeffrey Winters在此書中提齣瞭一種大膽的重新定義:寡頭是以高度財富集中為權力基礎、以保衛財富為主要政...
評分政治學上經典的政體分類,往往以亞裏士多德的“人數多寡+以公利/私利為本進行統治”為標準進行;在這種分類中,寡頭製被認為是“少數人以私利為本”而進行統治的政體。但Jeffrey Winters在此書中提齣瞭一種大膽的重新定義:寡頭是以高度財富集中為權力基礎、以保衛財富為主要政...
評分政治學上經典的政體分類,往往以亞裏士多德的“人數多寡+以公利/私利為本進行統治”為標準進行;在這種分類中,寡頭製被認為是“少數人以私利為本”而進行統治的政體。但Jeffrey Winters在此書中提齣瞭一種大膽的重新定義:寡頭是以高度財富集中為權力基礎、以保衛財富為主要政...
圖書標籤: 政治學 比較政治 寡頭政治 威權主義 民主轉型 Jeffrey_Winters 比較政治學 政治
Winters rediscovers the material definition of oligarchy, i.e. the concentration and defense of wealth. He successfully distinguishes oligarchs from elites, refutes the inherent conflict between democracy and oligarchy, and answers why material inequality persists. However, the conceptualization of political power is still somewhat unsatisfactory.
評分理論太ambitious,但材料和視野還是不錯的,特彆是老本行印尼那段。
評分Winters rediscovers the material definition of oligarchy, i.e. the concentration and defense of wealth. He successfully distinguishes oligarchs from elites, refutes the inherent conflict between democracy and oligarchy, and answers why material inequality persists. However, the conceptualization of political power is still somewhat unsatisfactory.
評分Winters rediscovers the material definition of oligarchy, i.e. the concentration and defense of wealth. He successfully distinguishes oligarchs from elites, refutes the inherent conflict between democracy and oligarchy, and answers why material inequality persists. However, the conceptualization of political power is still somewhat unsatisfactory.
評分Winters rediscovers the material definition of oligarchy, i.e. the concentration and defense of wealth. He successfully distinguishes oligarchs from elites, refutes the inherent conflict between democracy and oligarchy, and answers why material inequality persists. However, the conceptualization of political power is still somewhat unsatisfactory.
Oligarchy 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載