Is it fair to judge early Greek rhetoric by the standards of Plato and Aristotle? This text argues that it is not, and yet this is the path taken by current scholarship on the subject. Arguing against this view, this work sees early Greek rhetoric as largely unsystematic efforts to explore, more by means than by precept, all aspects of discourse. Replacing these early text by such treatises as the "Rhetoric" of Aristotle, Cole explains, can only be understood as part of a gradual process, as artistic prose came to be disseminated in written texts and so available in a form that, for the first time, be analyzed, evaluated and closely imitated.
具體描述
讀後感
用戶評價
Wardy懟他懟得還是有道理的……雖則這兩人的自我意識都太強瞭些。按我看，修辭學作為一種元語言亦即對語言的自覺，怎麼說也應該從智術師講起。
评分Wardy懟他懟得還是有道理的……雖則這兩人的自我意識都太強瞭些。按我看，修辭學作為一種元語言亦即對語言的自覺，怎麼說也應該從智術師講起。
评分Wardy懟他懟得還是有道理的……雖則這兩人的自我意識都太強瞭些。按我看，修辭學作為一種元語言亦即對語言的自覺，怎麼說也應該從智術師講起。
评分Wardy懟他懟得還是有道理的……雖則這兩人的自我意識都太強瞭些。按我看，修辭學作為一種元語言亦即對語言的自覺，怎麼說也應該從智術師講起。
评分Wardy懟他懟得還是有道理的……雖則這兩人的自我意識都太強瞭些。按我看，修辭學作為一種元語言亦即對語言的自覺，怎麼說也應該從智術師講起。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有