The quality of today's literary writing arouses the strongest opinions. For novelist and critic Gabriel Josipovici, the contemporary novel in English is profoundly disappointing - a poor relation of its groundbreaking Modernist forebears. This agile and passionate book asks why. Modernism, Josipovici suggests, is only superficially a reaction to industrialization or a revolution in diction and form; essentially, it is art coming to consciousness of its own limits and responsibilities. And its origins are to be sought not in 1850 or 1800, but in the early 1500s, with the crisis of society and perception that also led to the rise of Protestantism. With sophistication and persuasiveness, Josipovici charts some of Modernism's key stages, from Durer, Rabelais, and Cervantes to the present, bringing together a rich array of artists, musicians, and writers both familiar and unexpected - including Beckett, Borges, Friedrich, Cezanne, Stevens, Robbe-Grillet, Beethoven, and Wordsworth. He concludes with a stinging attack on the current literary scene in Britain and America, which raises questions about not only national taste, but contemporary culture itself.
發表於2024-11-15
What Ever Happened to Modernism? 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 現代性/現代主義 現代主義 文學理論/批評/研究 文學理論 大三上 English CL 2018
果然是小說傢寫的東西,後現代也全部劃到現代陣營且一直在為剋勞德西濛諸位打廣告…此外就算掉書袋也很不學院派。極好的部分,如堂吉訶德的驅魅與丟勒的畫作都很有可發明之處。主綫是傳統與個人之間的對立:在進入現代之後,失去傳統的個人如何在書寫中獲取自己的authority→少不瞭的兩種現代性。引文很有可觀之處,又想讀梅洛龐蒂瞭= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的點:把畢加索/杜尚/艾略特與巴赫金/羅伯格裏耶聯係起來,The marquise went out at five,對亞裏士多德的誤讀,human→action。但果然還是有點獨斷?自己有hindsight當然沒問題,但也不能強求所有人都脫離傳統寫作啊。
評分果然是小說傢寫的東西,後現代也全部劃到現代陣營且一直在為剋勞德西濛諸位打廣告…此外就算掉書袋也很不學院派。極好的部分,如堂吉訶德的驅魅與丟勒的畫作都很有可發明之處。主綫是傳統與個人之間的對立:在進入現代之後,失去傳統的個人如何在書寫中獲取自己的authority→少不瞭的兩種現代性。引文很有可觀之處,又想讀梅洛龐蒂瞭= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的點:把畢加索/杜尚/艾略特與巴赫金/羅伯格裏耶聯係起來,The marquise went out at five,對亞裏士多德的誤讀,human→action。但果然還是有點獨斷?自己有hindsight當然沒問題,但也不能強求所有人都脫離傳統寫作啊。
評分果然是小說傢寫的東西,後現代也全部劃到現代陣營且一直在為剋勞德西濛諸位打廣告…此外就算掉書袋也很不學院派。極好的部分,如堂吉訶德的驅魅與丟勒的畫作都很有可發明之處。主綫是傳統與個人之間的對立:在進入現代之後,失去傳統的個人如何在書寫中獲取自己的authority→少不瞭的兩種現代性。引文很有可觀之處,又想讀梅洛龐蒂瞭= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的點:把畢加索/杜尚/艾略特與巴赫金/羅伯格裏耶聯係起來,The marquise went out at five,對亞裏士多德的誤讀,human→action。但果然還是有點獨斷?自己有hindsight當然沒問題,但也不能強求所有人都脫離傳統寫作啊。
評分果然是小說傢寫的東西,後現代也全部劃到現代陣營且一直在為剋勞德西濛諸位打廣告…此外就算掉書袋也很不學院派。極好的部分,如堂吉訶德的驅魅與丟勒的畫作都很有可發明之處。主綫是傳統與個人之間的對立:在進入現代之後,失去傳統的個人如何在書寫中獲取自己的authority→少不瞭的兩種現代性。引文很有可觀之處,又想讀梅洛龐蒂瞭= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的點:把畢加索/杜尚/艾略特與巴赫金/羅伯格裏耶聯係起來,The marquise went out at five,對亞裏士多德的誤讀,human→action。但果然還是有點獨斷?自己有hindsight當然沒問題,但也不能強求所有人都脫離傳統寫作啊。
評分果然是小說傢寫的東西,後現代也全部劃到現代陣營且一直在為剋勞德西濛諸位打廣告…此外就算掉書袋也很不學院派。極好的部分,如堂吉訶德的驅魅與丟勒的畫作都很有可發明之處。主綫是傳統與個人之間的對立:在進入現代之後,失去傳統的個人如何在書寫中獲取自己的authority→少不瞭的兩種現代性。引文很有可觀之處,又想讀梅洛龐蒂瞭= =||||| 很whimsical但有意思的點:把畢加索/杜尚/艾略特與巴赫金/羅伯格裏耶聯係起來,The marquise went out at five,對亞裏士多德的誤讀,human→action。但果然還是有點獨斷?自己有hindsight當然沒問題,但也不能強求所有人都脫離傳統寫作啊。
What Ever Happened to Modernism? 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載