Social Knowledge in the Making

Charles Camic is the John Evans Professor of Sociology at Northwestern University and the author or editor of several volumes, including, most recently, Essential Writings of Thorstein Veblen. Neil Gross is associate professor of sociology at the University of British Columbia and the author of Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher. Michèle Lamont is the Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies, professor of Sociology, and professor of African and African American studies at Harvard University. Her most recent book is How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment.

出版者:University of Chicago Press

作者:Charles Camic

页数:464

出版时间:2011-10-15

价格:USD 30.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780226092096

图书标签:社会学知识社会学Knowledge知识传播学sociology社会理论社会學

Over the past quarter century, researchers have successfully explored the inner workings of the physical and biological sciences using a variety of social and historical lenses. Inspired by these advances, the contributors to Social Knowledge in the Making turn their attention to the social sciences, broadly construed. The result is the first comprehensive effort to study and understand the day-to-day activities involved in the creation of social-scientific and related forms of knowledge about the social world.

The essays collected here tackle a range of previously unexplored questions about the practices involved in the production, assessment, and use of diverse forms of social knowledge. A stellar cast of multidisciplinary scholars addresses topics such as the changing practices of historical research, anthropological data collection, library usage, peer review, and institutional review boards. Turning to the world beyond the academy, other essays focus on global banks, survey research organizations, and national security and economic policy makers. Social Knowledge in the Making is a landmark volume for a new field of inquiry, and the bold new research agenda it proposes will be welcomed in the social science, the humanities, and a broad range of nonacademic settings.

用户评价

唯一重要的就是对那种以input/output的方式在研究社会思想的人的批驳。（只看宏观社会结构、物质基础、阶层、经济发展等等，把这些作为社会思想的渊源，而不考察一个想法形成和传播的具体环境。）

唯一重要的就是对那种以input/output的方式在研究社会思想的人的批驳。（只看宏观社会结构、物质基础、阶层、经济发展等等，把这些作为社会思想的渊源，而不考察一个想法形成和传播的具体环境。）

唯一重要的就是对那种以input/output的方式在研究社会思想的人的批驳。（只看宏观社会结构、物质基础、阶层、经济发展等等，把这些作为社会思想的渊源，而不考察一个想法形成和传播的具体环境。）

唯一重要的就是对那种以input/output的方式在研究社会思想的人的批驳。（只看宏观社会结构、物质基础、阶层、经济发展等等，把这些作为社会思想的渊源，而不考察一个想法形成和传播的具体环境。）

唯一重要的就是对那种以input/output的方式在研究社会思想的人的批驳。（只看宏观社会结构、物质基础、阶层、经济发展等等，把这些作为社会思想的渊源，而不考察一个想法形成和传播的具体环境。）