The idea of human cruelty to animals so consumes novelist Elizabeth Costello in her later years that she can no longer look another person in the eye: humans, especially meat-eating ones, seem to her to be conspirators in a crime of stupefying magnitude taking place on farms and in slaughterhouses, factories, and laboratories across the world. Costello's son, a physics professor, admires her literary achievements, but dreads his mother's lecturing on animal rights at the college where he teaches. His colleagues resist her argument that human reason is overrated and that the inability to reason does not diminish the value of life; his wife denounces his mother's vegetarianism as a form of moral superiority. At the dinner that follows her first lecture, the guests confront Costello with a range of sympathetic and sceptical reactions to issues of animal rights, touching on broad philosophical, anthropological, and religious perspectives. Painfully for her son, Elizabeth Costello seems offensive and flaky, but - dare he admit it! - strangely on target. Here the internationally renowned writer J. M. Coetzee uses fiction to present a powerfully moving discussion of animal rights in all their complexity. He draws us into Elizabeth Costello's own sense of mortality, her compassion for animals, and her alienation from humans, even from her own family. In his fable, presented as a Tanner Lecture sponsored by the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University, Coetzee immerses us in a drama reflecting the real-life situation at hand: a writer delivering a lecture on an emotionally charged issue at a prestigious university. Literature, philosophy, performance, and deep human conviction - Coetzee brings all these elements into play. As in the story of Elizabeth Costello, the Tanner Lecture is followed by responses treating the reader to a variety of perspectives, delivered by leading thinkers in different fields. Coetzee's text is accompanied by an introduction by political philosopher Amy Gutmann and responsive essays by religion scholar Wendy Doniger, primatologist Barbara Smuts, literary theorist Marjorie Garber, and moral philosopher Peter Singer, author of Animal Liberation. Together the lecture-fable and the essays explore the palpable social consequences of uncompromising moral conflict and confrontation.
發表於2024-11-25
The Lives of Animals 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
書中體現瞭這樣一種思考,其中既包含瞭對於激進的動物權利主義運動批判性反思,又包含著對於人類中心論的深深質疑。如果動物可以被視為於人類平等的主體性存在,那植物(甚至細菌、微生物等)為什麼就不可以?“沒有什麼能夠妨礙我們設身處地地去為另一個生命著想”,同動物一...
評分庫切認為人類殺害和食用動物的行為是一種錯誤甚至邪惡。他的論據是什麼呢?他的論據是那些論證殺害動物是正當行為的人的理由是站不住腳的。那麼問題來瞭,彆人的論據有問題,是否就能證明,彆人所識圖證明的東西就一定是錯的呢?不一定。 庫切很不滿意笛卡爾把動物稱作活的機器...
評分庫切認為人類殺害和食用動物的行為是一種錯誤甚至邪惡。他的論據是什麼呢?他的論據是那些論證殺害動物是正當行為的人的理由是站不住腳的。那麼問題來瞭,彆人的論據有問題,是否就能證明,彆人所識圖證明的東西就一定是錯的呢?不一定。 庫切很不滿意笛卡爾把動物稱作活的機器...
評分庫切認為人類殺害和食用動物的行為是一種錯誤甚至邪惡。他的論據是什麼呢?他的論據是那些論證殺害動物是正當行為的人的理由是站不住腳的。那麼問題來瞭,彆人的論據有問題,是否就能證明,彆人所識圖證明的東西就一定是錯的呢?不一定。 庫切很不滿意笛卡爾把動物稱作活的機器...
評分書中體現瞭這樣一種思考,其中既包含瞭對於激進的動物權利主義運動批判性反思,又包含著對於人類中心論的深深質疑。如果動物可以被視為於人類平等的主體性存在,那植物(甚至細菌、微生物等)為什麼就不可以?“沒有什麼能夠妨礙我們設身處地地去為另一個生命著想”,同動物一...
圖書標籤: animal rights 動物學 Writing Class 隨筆 課本 環境文學
ENGL. 2010.
評分4+ 對於動物權利的討論,筆法高超
評分ENGL. 2010.
評分我一直覺得小說的呈現形式很好,說教感小瞭以後,讀者反而更加能專注思考小說中提齣的觀點。我非常喜歡餐桌上的討論,大傢似乎都因為一些微妙的原因而沒有完全錶達齣自己的立場,反而使得討論的真實感更強。
評分4+ 對於動物權利的討論,筆法高超
The Lives of Animals 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載