Jürgen Habermas is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Frankfurt and Professor of Philosophy at Northwestern University. He was recently awarded the 2004 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy by the Inamori Foundation. The Kyoto Prize is an international award to honor those who have contributed significantly to the scientific, cultural, and spiritual betterment of mankind.
This is Jurgen Habermas's most concrete historical-sociological book and one of the key contributions to political thought in the postwar period. It will be a revelation to those who have known Habermas only through his theoretical writing to find his later interests in problems of legitimation and communication foreshadowed in this lucid study of the origins, nature, and evolution of public opinion in democratic societies.
發表於2025-02-07
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
《公共領域的結構轉型》對於法蘭剋福學派的理論來說是非常具有代錶意義的。哈貝馬斯在書中闡釋瞭他心目中理想的社會結構,即自由主義經濟下公私分明的公共領域範疇。形成這個範疇的前提是私人領域從公共權力機關的指令下徹底解放,從而使政治公共領域充分發展,並與國傢機關...
評分Liberal model: private people who have autonomy based on private propety acquired in a market consisted of small commodity-exchangers and reflective subjectivity cultivated in the public sphere of literature come together to form a political public sphere i...
評分 評分Liberal model: private people who have autonomy based on private propety acquired in a market consisted of small commodity-exchangers and reflective subjectivity cultivated in the public sphere of literature come together to form a political public sphere i...
圖書標籤: Habermas 社會學 Sociology 哲學 哈貝馬斯 政治學 社會理論 政治哲學
(三星半)第四章的思想史梳理是本書寫的最好的部分,但是有關文藝復興時代的民間文化與建築空間關係的書寫,基本可以說是片麵的,但仍然可以作為一個概覽來閱讀,要全麵掌握,需要讀這兩個主題更專業的著作。由於以上瑕疵,導緻最後結論部分的方嚮錯誤。
評分第三次看。六十年代的H引用瞭很多英美的實證研究。最欣賞的是他勾連社會各個層麵的能力,私法、産權的界定、齣版業內部的結構、文化産品的商業化、政黨組織。這一部分對於目前的社會學研究也是最有參照價值的。比如網絡媒體的發展,與社會治理技術之間的互動關係。特有批判性的那些段落反倒不那麼喜歡瞭。他把兩段曆史放在一起比較,好像完全沒意識到測量的東西已經是不同的瞭。
評分重讀本科假裝讀完的書係列。。。
評分看到最後一頁,一個不小心,把之前辛苦做的讀書筆記全刪瞭。難道上天要讓我上課的時候再細讀一次麼。好吧。public sphere,之於中國好陌生啊,沙龍和茶館可相提並論麼?封建尾巴,國傢王權退卻,市民空間(商業、勞動、傢庭)興起,後又經現代化的過程,公與私領域互侵,及至福利國傢,似乎以公權獲勝為結局,大眾傳媒操作輿論,使得傳統定義的public opinion消失,私人的發聲需通過新形成的利益集團間的博弈體現。政治以非政治的方式延續。個中提到英國律師advocacy讓位於利益集團和黨派政治的鬥爭,兼具universality和rationality的真正的public opinion在議會中喪失。想起何師說的:律師本來就不是為瞭利益,而是公益的。應該迴到本初。
評分美寶姐姐課上的最大收獲。。
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載