John R. Searle is the Mills Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley. Among his books are Speech Acts; Expression and Meaning; The Campus War; Intentionality; The Rediscovery of the Mind; and Minds, Brains and Science, based on his acclaimed series of Reith Lectures.
In The Construction of Social Reality, John Searle argues that there are two kinds of facts--some that are independent of human observers, and some that require human agreement.
發表於2024-11-25
The Construction of Social Reality 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
頭一迴發評論,其實這本書我看得很糙。因為作者的邏輯很清晰,就是圍繞“X在C中可以當做Y”這一具有功能特色的核心命題來展開分析的。不過,我說瞭,我看書看得很糙,作者的闡釋沒有問題,至於有沒有缺點和茫然的地方,毫無疑問,有是有,隻不過我隻把其當做一本普通參考書來看...
評分頭一迴發評論,其實這本書我看得很糙。因為作者的邏輯很清晰,就是圍繞“X在C中可以當做Y”這一具有功能特色的核心命題來展開分析的。不過,我說瞭,我看書看得很糙,作者的闡釋沒有問題,至於有沒有缺點和茫然的地方,毫無疑問,有是有,隻不過我隻把其當做一本普通參考書來看...
評分頭一迴發評論,其實這本書我看得很糙。因為作者的邏輯很清晰,就是圍繞“X在C中可以當做Y”這一具有功能特色的核心命題來展開分析的。不過,我說瞭,我看書看得很糙,作者的闡釋沒有問題,至於有沒有缺點和茫然的地方,毫無疑問,有是有,隻不過我隻把其當做一本普通參考書來看...
評分頭一迴發評論,其實這本書我看得很糙。因為作者的邏輯很清晰,就是圍繞“X在C中可以當做Y”這一具有功能特色的核心命題來展開分析的。不過,我說瞭,我看書看得很糙,作者的闡釋沒有問題,至於有沒有缺點和茫然的地方,毫無疑問,有是有,隻不過我隻把其當做一本普通參考書來看...
評分頭一迴發評論,其實這本書我看得很糙。因為作者的邏輯很清晰,就是圍繞“X在C中可以當做Y”這一具有功能特色的核心命題來展開分析的。不過,我說瞭,我看書看得很糙,作者的闡釋沒有問題,至於有沒有缺點和茫然的地方,毫無疑問,有是有,隻不過我隻把其當做一本普通參考書來看...
圖書標籤: 哲學 分析哲學 Sociology 社會學 Searle 認識論 形而上學 philosophy
Objective vs Subjective (epistemic(taller,more pretty) and ontological senses(mountain,pain)); intrinsic and observer relative; Color;seeming to be F is necessary of being F; Function are never intrinsic but are always observer relative;Assigned function(heart)?? Brute & institutional facts;
評分陷在ontology和epistemology裏啦 “Not all consciousness is intentional, and not all intentionality is conscious”
評分Well I agree with him more than Berger & Luckmann brute facts!!!
評分@_@
評分封麵不對吧?
The Construction of Social Reality 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載