Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Chicago. His many contributions to political philosophy include The Political Philosophy of Hobbes and Liberalism Ancient and Modern, both published by the University of Chicago Press.
This work is Strauss' reading of Xenophon's dialogue, "Hiero" or "Tyrannicus", in which the tyrant Hiero and the poet Simonides discuss the advantages and disadvantages of exercising tyranny. This edition includes a translation of the dialogue, a critique of the commentary by the French philosopher Alexandre Kojeve, Strauss' restatement of his position in light of Kojeve's comments, and the complete Strauss-Kojeve correspondence.
人们本质上的暂时性和有限性→只能在各种存在的可能性中进行选择→在对智慧的追求和其他活动例如政治活动之间进行选择 +哲人的定义→哲人将把“他所有的时间”都贡献于对智慧的探求→“伊壁鸠鲁派”哲人的态度——哲人生活在“世界之外”→一个僭主可能打扰这个哲人,但是这样...
评分In his work On Tyranny, Leo Strauss close reads (between the lines) of Xenophon’s Hiero to suggest a divide between the philosophical and the political. Hiero, the tyrant, is provoked by Simonides, the wise man in this conversation on tyranny. At the same ...
评分In his work On Tyranny, Leo Strauss close reads (between the lines) of Xenophon’s Hiero to suggest a divide between the philosophical and the political. Hiero, the tyrant, is provoked by Simonides, the wise man in this conversation on tyranny. At the same ...
评分人们本质上的暂时性和有限性→只能在各种存在的可能性中进行选择→在对智慧的追求和其他活动例如政治活动之间进行选择 +哲人的定义→哲人将把“他所有的时间”都贡献于对智慧的探求→“伊壁鸠鲁派”哲人的态度——哲人生活在“世界之外”→一个僭主可能打扰这个哲人,但是这样...
评分历史上很少有哪个时代,哲人热衷于政治超过20世纪,在纳粹治下更是达到高潮。整个德国思想界面对纳粹不是陷入失语症,就是缺乏免疫力——如果不是推波助澜的话。作为在海德格尔哲学革命影响下成长起来的知识青年,施特劳斯无法忘怀这位“我们时代唯一的哲学家”,在1933年的政...
Brilliant interpretation.
评分只读了通信和科耶夫的文章
评分这本书让我知道陷入思想黑洞的可怕与享受
评分只读了Hiero和文本解读,后面有和科耶夫的通信辩论,没有看。敏锐地抓住了《君主论》第六章里对Hiero的称赞,认为这篇对话也是哲人对僭主的充满隐微的教导,从beneficent tyranny过渡到private life vs political/communal life,或者wisdom vs common recognition,进而过渡到virtue vs pleasure,二者冲突通过awareness of self-progress towards wisdom解决。第一次读controversial的施特劳斯,提出的问题很根本、也的确是现代社会忽视的,引人思考,但作者立场也没有彻底说服我。文本读得很细,特别值得学习。导读提到和科耶夫的争论在于哲人是远离还是改造共同体。
评分這本書令我深刻的認為,自己根本從未讀懂過Plato的對話錄。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有