With the incisiveness and lucid style for which he is renowned, Ronald Dworkin has written a masterful explanation of how the Anglo-American legal system works and on what principles it is grounded. Law's Empire is a full-length presentation of his theory of law that will be studied and debated--by scholars and theorists, by lawyers and judges, by students and political activists--for years to come. </p>
Dworkin begins with the question that is at the heart of the whole legal system: in difficult cases how do (and how should) judges decide what the law is? He shows that judges must decide hard cases by interpreting rather than simply applying past legal decisions, and he produces a general theory of what interpretation is--in literature as well as in law--and of when one interpretation is better than others. Every legal interpretation reflects an underlying theory about the general character of law: Dworkin assesses three such theories. One, which has been very influential, takes the law of a community to be only what the established conventions of that community say it is. Another, currently in vogue, assumes that legal practice is best understood as an instrument of society to achieve its goals. Dworkin argues forcefully and persuasively against both these views: he insists that the most fundamental point of law is not to report consensus or provide efficient means to social goals, but to answer the requirement that a political community act in a coherent and principled manner toward all its members. He discusses, in the light of that view, cases at common law, cases arising under statutes, and great constitutional cases in the Supreme Court, and he systematically demonstrates that his concept of political and legal integrity is the key to Anglo-American legal theory and practice. </p>
如果讀者早就知道德沃金的理論大概是什麼瞭,那其實也可以通過讀這個譯本看明白的,這是我個人的經驗。 這本書的所有理論都建立在一個假定上,即當我們隻有知道一個規則如何具體適用的情況下,我們纔能迴答“這個規則是什麼”這一抽象問題。所以說對一個法律規則適用不適用於...
評分在每一個學科領域,都存在許多重要著作,但隻有極少數著作,可以稱作界碑式的。界碑式著作不隻重要,它的齣現還意味著某種整體性變化,或用界碑一詞的通常含義來說,這類著作界定瞭一種新的學術研究的“邊界位置和走嚮”,甚至會引起學科精神氣質的改變。在過去五十年來的英語...
評分曆時半個多月讀完,掩捲深思,百感交集。 雖然本科、研究生階段都在學法學,雖然多年來我的職業經曆即是法學,但真正讀過的法學專著並不多,太多時間被荒廢。本書的經典地位和學術價值無需我這樣一個無名小卒多講,何況其嚴密的論證讓我並不能一直跟隨作者的腳步,但對我...
評分[按語:“法律帝國(Law’s empire)”一詞仿佛隱喻法律的人格化,在前言首段中有齣現。此書中Dworkin批評瞭法律實證主義(用批評時髦的法律語義學的形式),辯護瞭law as integrity的道德主義法學理想(偏嚮於自然法學派,但並不主張一種獨立於共同體之外的a priori morality...
評分如果讀者早就知道德沃金的理論大概是什麼瞭,那其實也可以通過讀這個譯本看明白的,這是我個人的經驗。 這本書的所有理論都建立在一個假定上,即當我們隻有知道一個規則如何具體適用的情況下,我們纔能迴答“這個規則是什麼”這一抽象問題。所以說對一個法律規則適用不適用於...
終於把此書的英文版讀畢,偉大的Empire,偉大的Dworkin.(於之江月輪山雪飄之時)ps:明天離開之江去玉泉。
评分終於把此書的英文版讀畢,偉大的Empire,偉大的Dworkin.(於之江月輪山雪飄之時)ps:明天離開之江去玉泉。
评分總算一次性從頭到尾一字不跳讀瞭一遍,把丟掉的筆記補上瞭,也做瞭後麵幾章的筆記。但感覺還沒完全理解。
评分時間不夠 要還迴去.. 法哲學部分好理解... 法學部分不好理解...... 沒法學基礎啊...
评分終於把此書的英文版讀畢,偉大的Empire,偉大的Dworkin.(於之江月輪山雪飄之時)ps:明天離開之江去玉泉。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有