No one has been more influential in the contemporary practice of art history than Erwin Panofsky, yet many of his early seminal papers remain virtually unknown to art historians. As a result, Michael Ann Holly maintains, art historians today do not have access to the full range of methodological considerations and possibilities that Panofsky's thought offers, and they often remain unaware of the significant role art history played in the development of modern humanistic thought. Placing Panofsky's theoretical work first in the context of the major historical paradigms generated by Hegel, Burckhardt, and Dilthey, Holly shows how these paradigms themselves became the grounds for creative controversy among Panofsky's predecessors Riegl, Wolfflin, Warburg, and Dvorak, among others. She also discusses how Panofsky's struggle with the terms and concepts of neo-Kantianism produced in his work remarkable parallels with the philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. Finally, she evaluates Panofsky's better known and later "iconological" studies by reading them against the earlier essays and by comparing his earlier ideas with the vision that has inspired recent work in the philosophy of history, semiotics, and the philosophy of science."
-
Paperback, 272 pages
Published February 6th 2015 by Cornell University Press (first published December 1984)
Original Title: Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History
ISBN: 0801498961 (ISBN13: 9780801498961)
Edition Language: English
-
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/724251.Panofsky_and_the_Foundations_of_Art_History
發表於2024-12-22
Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 藝術史 西方藝術史 圖像學 Kunstwissenschaft 藝術理論 藝術史學史 藝術史 美術理論
是本好書。讓我兢兢戰戰地通讀過後明白瞭兩點:對panofsky理論的理解遠沒有自己想象的那樣深入;第二點,正是因為如此,對之的運用沒有誇張到過度闡釋的地步,大體上樣子還過得去。
評分valuable but by no means exhaustive, the later chapters lose clarity and focus at the expense of a limited presentist/80s theoretical agenda, which disaffected Preziosi at the time, and is no longer convincing now; for Perspective essay, Wood's intro is more helpful; for relation with Cassirer/NeoKantianism, a broader intellectual context is needed
評分valuable but by no means exhaustive, the later chapters lose clarity and focus at the expense of a limited presentist/80s theoretical agenda, which disaffected Preziosi at the time, and is no longer convincing now; for Perspective essay, Wood's intro is more helpful; for relation with Cassirer/NeoKantianism, a broader intellectual context is needed
評分麵對圖像時代,我們越來越有必要重拾大潘神的理論武器瞭。德瑪西亞!
評分是本好書。讓我兢兢戰戰地通讀過後明白瞭兩點:對panofsky理論的理解遠沒有自己想象的那樣深入;第二點,正是因為如此,對之的運用沒有誇張到過度闡釋的地步,大體上樣子還過得去。
Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載