Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书著者简介

Shostakovich Reconsidered 电子书图书目录

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-05-29

Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

喜欢 Shostakovich Reconsidered 电子书的读者还喜欢

Shostakovich Reconsidered 电子书读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Toccata Press

作者:Allan B. Ho

出品人:

页数:792

译者:

出版时间:1998-6-19

价格:USD 80.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780907689560

丛书系列:

图书标签: 肖斯塔科维奇英文 Volkov Shostakovich Polemic

Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书图书描述

Allan Ho and Dmitry Feofanov systematically address all of the accusations levelled at Testimony and Solomon Volkov, Shostakovich's amanuensis, amassing an enormous amount of material about Shostakovich and his position in Soviet society and burying forever the picture of Shostakovich as a willing participant in the communist charade. Their analysis is complemented by a generous number of other essays, many of them by Shostakovich's close friends and acquaintances, and an interview with Solomon Volkov in which he explains how he worked with Shostakovich to help him write Testimony. Other contributors include the composer's son, Maxim, the cellist and conductor Mstislav Rostropovich and the poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko, whose verses of protest Shostakovich set in the Thirteenth Symphony. The book concludes with a bravura examination by Ian MacDonald of Shostakovich's political attitudes considered against the contemporary events that shaped them. The book does more than set the record straight -- it establishes beyond any doubt the enormous courage of one of the moral giants of the age.

Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

书太厚，800页，读不完，努力读了一半。两位作者旗帜鲜明地力挺伏尔科夫，像律师在法庭上慷慨陈词，详细列举证据，试图将质疑派一举驳倒。论辩中时有逻辑不通、诡辩、人身攻击，而且质疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和证据十分齐备（当然会出现不提不利于己方证据的情况），对于Fay和Taruskin等人的某些质疑，确有合理的反击。虽然火气较大，大字报味道稍浓，但作为相反意见的代表，也不可完全忽略。总之，有一定的价值。

评分☆☆☆☆☆