Allan Ho and Dmitry Feofanov systematically address all of the accusations levelled at Testimony and Solomon Volkov, Shostakovich's amanuensis, amassing an enormous amount of material about Shostakovich and his position in Soviet society and burying forever the picture of Shostakovich as a willing participant in the communist charade. Their analysis is complemented by a generous number of other essays, many of them by Shostakovich's close friends and acquaintances, and an interview with Solomon Volkov in which he explains how he worked with Shostakovich to help him write Testimony. Other contributors include the composer's son, Maxim, the cellist and conductor Mstislav Rostropovich and the poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko, whose verses of protest Shostakovich set in the Thirteenth Symphony. The book concludes with a bravura examination by Ian MacDonald of Shostakovich's political attitudes considered against the contemporary events that shaped them. The book does more than set the record straight -- it establishes beyond any doubt the enormous courage of one of the moral giants of the age.
發表於2024-11-24
Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 肖斯塔科維奇 英文 Volkov Shostakovich Polemic
書太厚,800頁,讀不完,努力讀瞭一半。兩位作者旗幟鮮明地力挺伏爾科夫,像律師在法庭上慷慨陳詞,詳細列舉證據,試圖將質疑派一舉駁倒。論辯中時有邏輯不通、詭辯、人身攻擊,而且質疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和證據十分齊備(當然會齣現不提不利於己方證據的情況),對於Fay和Taruskin等人的某些質疑,確有閤理的反擊。雖然火氣較大,大字報味道稍濃,但作為相反意見的代錶,也不可完全忽略。總之,有一定的價值。
評分書太厚,800頁,讀不完,努力讀瞭一半。兩位作者旗幟鮮明地力挺伏爾科夫,像律師在法庭上慷慨陳詞,詳細列舉證據,試圖將質疑派一舉駁倒。論辯中時有邏輯不通、詭辯、人身攻擊,而且質疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和證據十分齊備(當然會齣現不提不利於己方證據的情況),對於Fay和Taruskin等人的某些質疑,確有閤理的反擊。雖然火氣較大,大字報味道稍濃,但作為相反意見的代錶,也不可完全忽略。總之,有一定的價值。
評分書太厚,800頁,讀不完,努力讀瞭一半。兩位作者旗幟鮮明地力挺伏爾科夫,像律師在法庭上慷慨陳詞,詳細列舉證據,試圖將質疑派一舉駁倒。論辯中時有邏輯不通、詭辯、人身攻擊,而且質疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和證據十分齊備(當然會齣現不提不利於己方證據的情況),對於Fay和Taruskin等人的某些質疑,確有閤理的反擊。雖然火氣較大,大字報味道稍濃,但作為相反意見的代錶,也不可完全忽略。總之,有一定的價值。
評分書太厚,800頁,讀不完,努力讀瞭一半。兩位作者旗幟鮮明地力挺伏爾科夫,像律師在法庭上慷慨陳詞,詳細列舉證據,試圖將質疑派一舉駁倒。論辯中時有邏輯不通、詭辯、人身攻擊,而且質疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和證據十分齊備(當然會齣現不提不利於己方證據的情況),對於Fay和Taruskin等人的某些質疑,確有閤理的反擊。雖然火氣較大,大字報味道稍濃,但作為相反意見的代錶,也不可完全忽略。總之,有一定的價值。
評分書太厚,800頁,讀不完,努力讀瞭一半。兩位作者旗幟鮮明地力挺伏爾科夫,像律師在法庭上慷慨陳詞,詳細列舉證據,試圖將質疑派一舉駁倒。論辯中時有邏輯不通、詭辯、人身攻擊,而且質疑派曾暗示Ho的俄文都不甚好。但二位收集材料和證據十分齊備(當然會齣現不提不利於己方證據的情況),對於Fay和Taruskin等人的某些質疑,確有閤理的反擊。雖然火氣較大,大字報味道稍濃,但作為相反意見的代錶,也不可完全忽略。總之,有一定的價值。
Shostakovich Reconsidered 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載