Margaret Olwen MacMillan, OC (born 1943 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada) is a historian and professor at the University of Oxford, where she is Warden of St. Antony's College. She is former provost of Trinity College and professor of history at the University of Toronto and previously, at Ryerson University. A leading expert on history and international relations, MacMillan is a frequent commentator in the media.
From Publishers Weekly
A joke circulating in Paris early in 1919 held that the peacemaking Council of Four, representing Britain, France, the U.S. and Italy, was busy preparing a "just and lasting war." Six months of parleying concluded on June 28 with Germany's coerced agreement to a treaty no Allied statesman had fully read, according to MacMillan, a history professor at the University of Toronto, in this vivid account. Although President Wilson had insisted on a League of Nations, even his own Senate would vote the league down and refuse the treaty. As a rush to make expedient settlements replaced initial negotiating inertia, appeals by many nationalities for Wilsonian self-determination would be overwhelmed by rhetoric justifying national avarice. The Italians, who hadn't won a battle, and the French, who'd been saved from catastrophe, were the greediest, says MacMillan; the Japanese plucked Pacific islands that had been German and a colony in China known for German beer. The austere and unlikable Wilson got nothing; returning home, he suffered a debilitating stroke. The council's other members horse-traded for spoils, as did Greece, Poland and the new Yugoslavia. There was, Wilson declared, "disgust with the old order of things," but in most decisions the old order in fact prevailed, and corrosive problems, like Bolshevism, were shelved. Hitler would blame Versailles for more ills than it created, but the signatories often could not enforce their writ. MacMillan's lucid prose brings her participants to colorful and quotable life, and the grand sweep of her narrative encompasses all the continents the peacemakers vainly carved up. 16 pages of photos, maps.
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Library Journal
In an ambitious narrative, MacMillan (history, University of Toronto) seeks to recover the original intent, constraints, and goals of the diplomats who sat down to hammer out a peace treaty in the aftermath of the Great War. In particular, she focuses on the "Big Three" Wilson (United States), Lloyd George (Great Britain), and Clemenceau (France) who dominated the critical first six months of the Paris Peace Conference. Viewing events through such a narrow lens can reduce diplomacy to the parochial concerns of individuals. But instead of falling into this trap, MacMillan uses the Big Three as a starting point for analyzing the agendas of the multitude of individuals who came to Versailles to achieve their largely nationalist aspirations. Following her analysis of the forces at work in Europe, MacMillan takes the reader on a tour de force of the postwar battlefields of Asia and the Middle East. Of particular interest is her sympathy for those who tried to make the postwar world more peaceful. Although their lofty ambitions fell prey to the passions of nationalism, this should not detract from their efforts. This book will help rehabilitate the peacemakers of 1919 and is recommended for all libraries. Frederic Krome, Jacob Rader Marcus Ctr. of the American Jewish Archives, Cincinnati
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
發表於2025-06-01
Paris 1919 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
花瞭三周看完此書(中文版據說有瞭),建議每個喜歡曆史的朋友至少看兩遍。可以說,今天世界政治的每一個層麵,都在98年前的巴黎決定瞭,今天的所有問題都可以在那裏找到答案。我隻說一點感受:一戰前,世界上隻有二三十個國傢,其他地方要麼是這些國傢的殖民地,要麼是“化外...
評分說起來,在推介這本書閱讀之前,身為曆史學背景齣身的我是對本書有所耳聞的。不僅如此,對於巴黎和會及其之後的華盛頓會議對近現代世界格局的重大意義也是耳熟能詳,其所建立起來的是一套國際社會契約性質的大國框架深深的烙印在世界的每一個角落和層麵,所謂的“凡爾賽—...
評分#2014-02-19# Paris 1919 六個月一戰和談,簽訂凡爾賽條約,英法美三巨頭博弈爭吵製衡重新書寫世界秩序,德國最終快速進入報復循環,54運動被觸發,布爾什維剋繼續發展;事實證明當年的溝通框架,政治傢智慧沒能有效應對危機,反而給世界帶來更大危機。書中幾乎沒有講任何大道...
評分花瞭三周看完此書(中文版據說有瞭),建議每個喜歡曆史的朋友至少看兩遍。可以說,今天世界政治的每一個層麵,都在98年前的巴黎決定瞭,今天的所有問題都可以在那裏找到答案。我隻說一點感受:一戰前,世界上隻有二三十個國傢,其他地方要麼是這些國傢的殖民地,要麼是“化外...
評分花瞭三周看完此書(中文版據說有瞭),建議每個喜歡曆史的朋友至少看兩遍。可以說,今天世界政治的每一個層麵,都在98年前的巴黎決定瞭,今天的所有問題都可以在那裏找到答案。我隻說一點感受:一戰前,世界上隻有二三十個國傢,其他地方要麼是這些國傢的殖民地,要麼是“化外...
圖書標籤: 曆史 1919 巴黎和會 國際政治 政治 近代 History 英語
英國給這個世界帶來的苦難要多於貢獻,雖然對每件事的孤立解釋都是那麼振振有詞。 美國是中國的朋友。
評分在擱置瞭幾年之後終於讀完瞭!MacMillan對巴黎閤會那段歷史的敘述非常客觀細緻。沒有個人的感情色彩能讓讀者自己去領悟歷史的教訓。在我看來,凡爾賽閤約是注定不能避免二戰的爆發。雖然英美法意意圖盡力調停,但是沒有完全脫離殖民主義和利己主義的思維。這導緻以歐洲為中心重新構架世界格局引發更多的民族主義情緒。經過兩次代價慘重的世界大戰之後,人類理應能夠從中得到教訓。然而縱觀今天的世界,一個世紀前導緻世界之戰的眾多因素有死灰復燃之勢。
評分書的前主人的筆記非常詳細 奈何我對一戰的曆史知識是幾乎沒有 啃這一點點已經非常吃力瞭 印象深刻的是“Paris was sad and beautiful as the peacemakers began to assemble from all parts of the world in January 1919.”
評分在擱置瞭幾年之後終於讀完瞭!MacMillan對巴黎閤會那段歷史的敘述非常客觀細緻。沒有個人的感情色彩能讓讀者自己去領悟歷史的教訓。在我看來,凡爾賽閤約是注定不能避免二戰的爆發。雖然英美法意意圖盡力調停,但是沒有完全脫離殖民主義和利己主義的思維。這導緻以歐洲為中心重新構架世界格局引發更多的民族主義情緒。經過兩次代價慘重的世界大戰之後,人類理應能夠從中得到教訓。然而縱觀今天的世界,一個世紀前導緻世界之戰的眾多因素有死灰復燃之勢。
評分deatil of peace making after WWI
Paris 1919 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載