For the last two decades, Paris has been the center of a polyglot literary criticism best characterized by its concern for the impact of language on society. One of the most influential and controversial voices of this movement belongs to Michel Foucault. Translating some of Foucault's most important essays, lectures, and interviews, Donald Bouchard has skillfully edited this selection into three parts which successively develop and extend the critic's assault on system and structure. According to Foucault, in the last few centuries language has burst into a limitless, uncontrollable multiplicity with words and books taking on new meanings in an ever-changing context. Tracing the development in the words of de Sade, Halderlin, Flaubert, Bataille, Nietzsche, and Deleuze, Foucault welcomes the flux as an affirmation of infinite possibilities for the writer. Those who search for the static, all encompassing truths, he contends, are only seeking to enhance their own power. Foucault prefers to approach the past with Nietzschean genealogy, not in search of unifying, exclusive threads, but looking instead for the counter-memory: ""accidents, . . . the false appraisals, and the faulty calculations that gave birth to those things that continue to exist and have value for us."" In the interviews of the third section, Foucault discusses how his literary theories could affect the social environment. Considering the rejection of classification and categorization in the other sections, it follows that he espouses a radical politics critical of French educational and justice systems, which, he claims, were conceived in the narrow interests of the ruling class. After the earlier ascriptions of social significance to language, this leap from literature to politics seems neither abrupt nor surprising. For anyone interested in the potential of words beyond the page, Foucault will be an exalting instructor.
發表於2024-11-22
Language, Counter-Memory, Practice 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: Foucault 福柯 法國 哲學 Michel-Foucault 文學理論 語言 理論
"what is an author?"
評分讀過Foucault與Deleuze的一篇,基本上就是前者滿嘴power,後者滿嘴multiplicity,偶爾quote對方兩句話,並沒達成什麼共識
評分what is an author
評分what is an author
評分嚴格來說,60年代的福柯像一個隻看過尼采和康德(沒看懂)然後看瞭幾本網紅民哲(巴塔耶等)就覺得自己看破紅塵的emo小孩;但因為這是福柯(福柯的作者功能)所以這本讀起來就像是給福柯這個賦格再多瞭一個聲部,仿佛這本書就是那本隱喻瞭之後的每一本福柯的書;另一方麵裏麵對搞明白福柯的主體問題還是很有用的。作者留下的空隙,重新發現屍體的傷口,等等。然後我終於看瞭他寫尼采的那篇,很久以前看不懂。覺得還是有點意思的,值得細讀(寫論文用),也理解瞭哈貝馬斯對福柯的批判,雖然原則上我還是認為哈貝馬斯“無法總體化局部問題”這個點其實在後來的福柯那裏被直接超越瞭。
Language, Counter-Memory, Practice 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載