Feng Li, associate professor (EALAC), received his M.A. from the Institute of Archaeology , Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (1986); and his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago (2000). Professor Li is both a historian and an archaeologist specializing in early China . His recent publications include: Landscape and Power in Early China: The Crisis and Fall of the Western Zhou 1045–771 BC (Cambridge 2006); “‘Offices’ in Bronze Inscriptions and Western Zhou Government Administration,” Early China 26 (2002); “Feudalism and Western Zhou China: A Criticism,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 63 (2003); and “Succession and Promotion: Elite Mobility during the Western Zhou,” Monumenta Serica 52 (2004). His new book Bureaucracy and the State in Early China : Governing the Western Zhou 1045–771 BC ( Cambridge forthcoming) examines the political system of early Bronze-Age states. As an archaeologist, he is an expert of Chinese bronzes and is interested in cross-region cultural relations. He is the director of Columbia ’s archaeological project in Shandong China, and serves also as co-chair of the Columbia Early China Seminar.
發表於2024-11-08
Landscape and Power in Early China 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
一兩年前看到人傢談起這本書的內容時就大為心動,立馬買下,卻拖到現在纔看(遮臉),不過好書總是不嫌晚的。 《西周的滅亡》是李峰先生針對周朝滅亡的研究成果,他最讓筆者讚賞的是,作者不隻運用瞭上古文獻、金文等考古成果外,還搭配瞭地理學來佐證其論點,佩服之餘,也不由...
評分Your evidence can only be as strong as your weakest point. 以最強之論據,得最弱之論點。 下麵僅談一些印象最深刻的地方。 關於政治體製: 將西周的政治體製放在整個曆史中,它是指中央政權與地方政權到底應該以何種方式存在的討論。西周分封製的最終崩潰,對秦、漢乃至整...
評分小時候翻《中國上下五韆年》之類的曆史普及讀物,談到西周的滅亡,總能看到“烽火戲諸侯”的故事,當時心裏就有個小小的疑惑:諸侯兵至而發現沒有戎狄來犯,這有什麼可笑的呢?但這個小小的疑惑轉念又被推翻:既然書裏都這麼寫瞭,肯定就是沒錯吧;我的疑惑,大約是我見識還不...
評分非常精彩,梳理瞭西周研究中的許多重大而又似是而非的問題。好的方麵就不多說瞭,僅提齣兩點可商榷之處。 1. 第四章西周滅亡的地理考訂,隻分析瞭西申的地望,但是卻沒有探討鄫國的地望,而是考察瞭另一個關係不大的呂的地望,這不能不說是個遺憾。在滅亡西周這個大事件上,鄫...
評分相當好的曆史學著作,兼具學術性與可讀性。好到什麼程度呢?哪怕在極度擁擠的北京地鐵4號綫早高峰上也能安下心來讀。 作者對地理的熟稔讓人難忘,通過地理-傳世文獻-考古報告-金文的完美結閤,成功的還原瞭西周國傢所麵臨的地緣形勢及其危機。 作者還對西周國傢的政治、經濟結...
圖書標籤: 考古學 景觀 上古 海外中國研究 李峰 外文 古代史 原文譯著對比
Landscape and Power in Early China 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載