History of Political Ideas (Volume 5)

出版者:University of Missouri Press

作者:Eric Voegelin

页数:264pages

出版时间:September 1998

价格:$42.50

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780826211941

具体描述

Examining the emergence of modernity within the philosophical and political debates of the sixteenth century, Religion and the Rise of Modernity resumes the analysis of the "great confusion" introduced in Volume IV of History of Political Ideas. Encompassing a vast range of events ignited by Luther's Ninety-Five Theses, this period is one of controversy, revolution, and partiality.

Despite the era's fragmentation and complexity, Voegelin's insightful analysis clarifies its significance and suggests the lines of change converging at a point in the future: the medieval Christian understanding of a divinely created closed cosmos was being replaced by a distinctly modern form of human consciousness that posits man as the proper origin of meaning in the universe.

Analyzing the most significant features of the great confusion, Voegelin examines a vast range of thought and issues of the age. From the more obvious thinkers to those less frequently studied, this volume features such figures as Calvin, Althusius, Hooker, Bracciolini, Savonarola, Copernicus, Tycho de Brahe, and Giordano Bruno. Devoting a considerable amount of attention to Jean Bodin, Voegelin presents him as a prophet of a new, true religion amid the civilizational disorder of the post-Christian era. Focusing on such traditional themes as monarchy, just war theory, and the philosophy of law, this volume also investigates issues within astrology, cosmology, and mathematics.

Religion and the Rise of Modernity is a valuable work of scholarship not only because of its treatment of individual thinkers and doctrines influential in the sixteenth century and beyond but also because of its close examination of those experiences that formed the modern outlook.

作者简介

About the Author

Eric Voegelin (1901-1985) was one of the most original and influential philosophers of our time. Born in Cologne, Germany, he studied at the University of Vienna, where he became a professor of political science in the Faculty of Law. In 1938, he and his wife, fleeing Hitler, emigrated to the United States. They became American citizens in 1944. Voegelin spent much of his career at Louisiana State University, the University of Munich, and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. During his lifetime he published many books and more than one hundred articles. The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin will make available in a uniform edition all of Voegelin's major writings.

About the Editor

James L. Wiser is Vice President of Academic Affairs at the University of San Francisco. He is the author of Political Philosophy: A History of the Search for Order and Political Theory: A Thematic Inquiry.

目录信息

Editor's Introduction I
Part Five. The Great Confusion (continued from Vol.IV)
2. The Great Confusion II: Decisions and Positions 17
§1. Survey of Issues 19
§2. La Boétie 28
§3. The Monarchomachic Trend 39
a. Character of the Trend
b. Salamonius
c. The Absorbtion of the Religious Movements
d. Calvin's Theocracy
e. Knox
f. The Vindiciae
g. Althusius
§4. The Jesuit Thinkers 59
3. The English Commonwealth--Hooker 70
§1. The Beginnings of English Political Thought 70
§2. The Closure of the Commonwealth 74
§3. The Literary Chorus 77
§4. Hooker's Christian Commonwealth 80
§5. Portrait of the Puritan 88
§6. Philosophy of Law 98
4. Interpolity Relations--Vitoria 108
§1. Internationalism 108
§2. The Great Design 111
§3. The Conception of Interstate Law 113
§4. The Distinction between Interstate and Intercivilizational Relations 115
§5. The Just War 117
§6. The Legal Technique of Imperialism 121
a. The Organization of the Argument
b. The Natural Law of Human Intercourse
c. The Propagation of Christianity
d. Civilizational Superiority
e. Conclusion
§7. Vitoria's Personality 128
§8. Later Development of Intercivilizational Relations 131
5. Man in History and Nature 134
§1. The Problem of Modernity 134
§2. Poggio Bracciolini 138
a. Fame
b. Europe and Asia
§3. Louis Le Roy 143
a. Pessimism and Optimism
b. Civilizational Epochs
c. The Rhythms of Nature
d. Eternal Recurrence
§4. Astrology 149
a. Savonarola
b. Melanchthon
c. Rantzau
d. Papal Constitutions
§5. Cosmology 155
a. Copernicus
b. Bodin
aa. Science and Contemplation
bb. Natural Order and Political Order
cc. Certainty and Catharsis
dd. Cosmic Hierarchy and Political Hierarchy
§6. Tycho de Brahe 163
a. Renascent Creation
b. Conservative Misgivings
§7. Mathematics 165
a. Function and Effects of Mathematical Speculation
b. Ontology and Mathematics
§8. Giordano Bruno 168
a. Intellectual Liberation
b. The Substance of the Cosmos
c. The Ecstasy of Speculation
d. The Infinity of the Cosmos
§9. The Idea of the Infinite and Its Application 176
a. The Mathematical Infinite
b. The Infinite in Ontological Speculation
6. Bodin 180
§1. Mediterranean Modernity 181
§2. The Style of Work 184
§3. Bodin's Religion--Biographical Data 186
§4. The Letter to Jean Bautru 188
§5. Preciosa Mors 190
§6. The Program 192
§7. God, Angels, and Men 196
§8. Tolerance--The Heptaplomeres 205
§9. History 219
a. History and Anthropology
b. Individual and Universal History
c. The Spatial Order of History
d. The Temporal Order of History
[§10. Bodin: Variorum] 236
a. Bodin桝 Representative of Mediterranean Civilization
b. Style of Work
c. Religious Attitude
d. The Heptaplomeres 桾oleration
e. Contemplative Realism桾he Aristotelian Problem
f. The Theory of Climates桭rance, the New Omphalos
g. Cosmological Thought
h. Hierarchy桾he Feidh
i. Legal Hierarchy梩he Structure of the Modern State
j. Corollaries
k. Definitions of Sovereignty
l. The Problem of Power
m. the Harmonious Cosmion
n. Ascent to God
Index 253
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

这一章对观柯瓦雷的《从封闭世界到无限宇宙》（From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe）会很有意思。沃格林的梳理非常细腻。无限宇宙的打开不是一蹴而就的，其间经历了复杂的情感历程及宇宙发现过程。 新的宇宙概念： 潮流、潮流交叉和反潮流的模式是极其复杂的，但...

这一章对观柯瓦雷的《从封闭世界到无限宇宙》（From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe）会很有意思。沃格林的梳理非常细腻。无限宇宙的打开不是一蹴而就的，其间经历了复杂的情感历程及宇宙发现过程。 新的宇宙概念： 潮流、潮流交叉和反潮流的模式是极其复杂的，但...

这一章对观柯瓦雷的《从封闭世界到无限宇宙》（From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe）会很有意思。沃格林的梳理非常细腻。无限宇宙的打开不是一蹴而就的，其间经历了复杂的情感历程及宇宙发现过程。 新的宇宙概念： 潮流、潮流交叉和反潮流的模式是极其复杂的，但...

这一章对观柯瓦雷的《从封闭世界到无限宇宙》（From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe）会很有意思。沃格林的梳理非常细腻。无限宇宙的打开不是一蹴而就的，其间经历了复杂的情感历程及宇宙发现过程。 新的宇宙概念： 潮流、潮流交叉和反潮流的模式是极其复杂的，但...

这一章对观柯瓦雷的《从封闭世界到无限宇宙》（From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe）会很有意思。沃格林的梳理非常细腻。无限宇宙的打开不是一蹴而就的，其间经历了复杂的情感历程及宇宙发现过程。 新的宇宙概念： 潮流、潮流交叉和反潮流的模式是极其复杂的，但...

用户评价

这部厚重的“政治思想史”第五卷，坦白说，拿到手里的时候，我的第一反应是望而生畏。内封的装帧设计走的是一种沉稳的学院派风格，纸张的质感很扎实，那种微微泛着米黄色的纸张，让人感觉它承载了足够的分量。我原本期待能看到对某些关键时期的思想家进行更具颠覆性的解读，毕竟这是该系列的第五部，应该已经进入了对现代性或后现代性的深入探讨。然而，翻阅目录和前几章的章节标题后，我发现内容似乎更多地聚焦于对既有理论框架的梳理和细致的文献考证，而非大胆的理论创新或对当代政治困境的锐利剖析。例如，其中关于某个特定学派的流变分析，虽然文献引用详实到令人惊叹，几乎可以作为一篇博士论文的参考文献部分来使用，但它对于一个急于理解“为什么我们今天会这样思考政治”的普通读者来说，显得有些过于枝蔓和晦涩。文字密度极高，段落之间的逻辑推进虽然严谨，但缺乏那种能让人眼前一亮的观点提炼，读起来需要极大的耐心和反复回溯的精力，更像是一部供专业人士存档备查的工具书，而非激发思考的启蒙读物。我希望书中能有更多关于具体历史事件如何塑造了理论形态的鲜活案例，而不是仅仅停留在文本内部的循环论证。

这本书的结构安排，怎么说呢，像是一台运行极其精确但缺乏灵魂的精密仪器。我特别注意了关于“权力与合法性”那一章的论述——我原本希望能看到作者如何调和福柯的微观权力分析与哈贝马斯的沟通行动理论之间的张力，或者至少对两者进行一次有力的对话。但实际呈现的内容，更像是在将两个理论体系分别放在显微镜下观察，然后小心翼翼地记录下各自的细胞结构，却很少尝试将它们放在一起进行一次激烈的碰撞。行文的语态倾向于一种冷静的、去个人化的叙事，仿佛作者刻意抹去了自身的主观色彩，力求达到一种“客观的”历史陈述。这种“去情感化”的处理方式，使得那些原本充满激情与冲突的思想交锋，读起来如同在阅读一份古老的法律条文。当我读到关于某个“世纪末”思潮的总结时，我期待的是一种对时代精神的捕捉和诗意概括，但得到的却是一长串的因果关系链条，清晰无疑，却也冰冷僵硬。它缺少那种能够触动读者内心深处，让你忍不住停下来思考“我是否同意”的强劲语流。

作为一位长期关注政治哲学演变的研究者，我通常欣赏学术著作的严谨性，但这第五卷的行文节奏，实在让人感到疲惫。全书的论证链条铺陈得极其漫长，一个论点需要经过三到四页的铺垫和文献对比才能最终落脚。这种写作风格，对于已经熟悉该领域核心概念的读者或许是一种“安全感”的保证，意味着作者没有留下任何可被攻击的逻辑漏洞。然而，对于渴望获得洞察力的读者而言，这种“滴水不漏”反而成了阅读的障碍。书中对某一重要概念的定义和阐释，占据了整整十五章的内容，其深度固然无可指摘，但它似乎陷入了一种自我循环的泥淖——不断地以更复杂的语言去定义那个已经被定义了无数次的词汇。我希望能看到更具穿透力的比喻，或者一种能够迅速切入核心矛盾的叙事手法。这种过度细致的、近乎于学术洁癖的写作，反而稀释了思想本身原有的锐度和冲击力，使得整部作品在宏大叙事上显得有些支离破碎，更像是一部百科全书的索引而非思想的史诗。

谈到本书的视角和立场，我本可以接受其作为一部通史类著作所必须具备的平衡性，即对不同流派给予大致平等的对待。但是，在阅读到关于“启蒙运动的遗产”那一单元时，我明显感受到了某种保守主义倾向的潜流。这种倾向并非通过激烈的言辞表达出来，而是通过一种选择性的强调和略微的淡化来实现的。例如，对于那些对现代自由主义提出根本性批判的思想家，他们的观点被细致地分析了其逻辑缺陷，而对他们的批判性动力和时代背景却着墨不多。反之，对于那些奠定现代国家理论基础的学者的论述，则使用了更为积极和肯定的语言来描述其历史进步性。这种微妙的“配重”差异，使得这本书在试图构建一个全景图景的同时，也无形中强化了对既定主流政治框架的认可度。它更像是在为现有体制提供一套坚实的思想支撑体系的梳理，而不是在探寻那些被主流压抑或边缘化的、可能更具反思价值的另类声音。我本希望看到一场更具批判性的、甚至略带颠覆性的思想对话，而非一次对既有秩序的详尽的“证明”过程。

这本书的译者团队，从注释的规范性来看，无疑是付出了巨大的努力，每一个引文的出处都标注得清清楚楚，甚至连拉丁文或德文的原文都有所保留。但是，这种严苛的学术规范，似乎在某种程度上牺牲了语言的流畅性和可读性。许多句子被拉得极长，从句层层嵌套，读者在试图理解主干意思之前，已经迷失在了各种限定词和插入语之中。我感觉自己像是在攀爬一座由复杂的从句构成的阶梯，每一步都必须小心翼翼地辨认脚下的文字是否准确无误，而忽略了对更高处风景的眺望。特别是在涉及对某个抽象概念进行“解构”的段落，译文的风格变得尤为晦涩，它忠实地保留了原文的结构复杂性，却未能有效地在中国读者的语言习惯中重建其逻辑骨架。如果能有更灵活的句式处理，或许能更好地服务于内容的传播，而不是仅仅为了在字面上实现与原著的绝对对应，读完后，脑海里留下的更多是“我读懂了复杂的句子”，而不是“我理解了深刻的思想”。