[澳]J.J.C.斯玛特,当代著名哲学家,学术上深受英国传统功利主义思想影响,其哲学教育完成于牛津大学,此后长年执教于澳大利亚阿德莱德大学和澳大利亚国立大学。
[英]伯纳德·威廉斯,当代道德哲学领域首屈一指的大师,早年在牛津大学研究哲学和古典学,曾先后担任伦敦大学、剑桥大学、牛津大学和加州大学伯克利分校的
发表于2024-11-22
Utilitarianism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
p39幸福是一种描述性的概念,但同时也是评价性的。在傻子的快乐和苏格拉底的痛苦之间,除了快乐与否的状态之外,还有对其可欲求状态的评判。 p64在大多数实际情形中,应该做什么是一种经验性的分歧。终极价值并不需要完全一致,只需要差不多接近即可。 p93西季威克所说的“赞美...
评分p39幸福是一种描述性的概念,但同时也是评价性的。在傻子的快乐和苏格拉底的痛苦之间,除了快乐与否的状态之外,还有对其可欲求状态的评判。 p64在大多数实际情形中,应该做什么是一种经验性的分歧。终极价值并不需要完全一致,只需要差不多接近即可。 p93西季威克所说的“赞美...
评分 评分很难很难买到。书本身很好,两个人各说一半。斯马特和威廉斯各说一半。我个人赞同前者,尽管后者从学术声望上而言要知名得多。
图书标签: 伦理学 哲学 西方哲学 道德哲学 哲學 功利主义 Bernard.Williams 近代
Two essays on utilitarianism, written from opposite points of view, by J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams. In the first part of the book Professor Smart advocates a modern and sophisticated version of classical utilitarianism; he tries to formulate a consistent and persuasive elaboration of the doctrine that the rightness and wrongness of actions is determined solely by their consequences, and in particular their consequences for the sum total of human happiness. This is a revised version of Professor Smart's famous essay 'an outline of a system of utilitarian ethics', first published in 1961 but long unobtainable. In Part II Bernard Williams offers a sustained and vigorous critique of utilitarian assumptions, arguments and ideals. He finds inadequate the theory of action implied by utilitarianism, and he argues that utilitarianism fails to engage at a serious level with the real problems of moral and political philosophy, and fails to make sense of notions such as integrity, or even human happiness itself. Both authors are agreed on utilitarianism's importance: it cuts across a number of different philosophical disputes and combines a systematic account of mata-ethical problems with a distinctive and substantive moral stand. It thus is, or involves, philosophy in both the traditional and the narrower, professional sense of the word, and is a key topic (often the first topic) in introductory philosophy courses. This book should also be of interest to welfare economists, political scientists and decision-theorists.
文辞华美,逻辑清楚——只可惜这些都不能保证说理的正确
评分没读完。
评分算是读过最经典的部分了,在大学有空读完吧
评分For的部分乍一看来一步步条理很清楚,但是实际上漏洞很多,尤其是作者说act的u比rule的u好,但是按他那个逻辑,会得出相反的结论……Against的部分总感觉是在u与kantian之间找平衡,而且,也太像亚里士多德的NE了吧!!!
评分文辞华美,逻辑清楚——只可惜这些都不能保证说理的正确
Utilitarianism 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书