Ronald C. Egan is Professor of Sinology in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Stanford University.
发表于2024-12-22
The Burden of Female Talent 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
艾朗诺《才女之累:李清照及其接受史》的第八章对明清时期的李清照接受史作出了非常详尽且精妙的分析,尤其是关于清代学者否认李清照改嫁这一学术公案的梳理与剖析,更是让读者击节赞赏。但是笔者在阅读此书的过程中,觉得艾朗诺对清代学者否认李清照改嫁的分析,略有些浮于表...
评分《才女之累:李清照及其接受史》,艾朗诺。书本第一章从“宋代的女作家”开始,探讨了易安词的时代背景,说明了在男权社会中,女性书写的边缘化地位。第二章“写作与争取认可的努力”,对易安的创作动机进行了推断,身为女性跻身以男性创作为主体的文人圈时,所遭遇的巨大阻力...
评分 评分第一章回应了疑问为什么不把李清照与当时宋代有才学女子进行比较,放入时代风气中研究,指出两个传统读而不写,不宜外传,与明清差异较大并无女子结社,并指出朱淑真很可能是伪造。不过尽管诗作留存的女子少,放入大的女性文学或者读书传统之中或许仍然有必要。 第二章词论把词...
图书标签: 李清照 海外中国研究 诗歌 海外汉学 文学研究 文学 宋代 宋
Widely considered the preeminent Chinese woman poet, Li Qingzhao (1084-1150s) occupies a crucial place in China’s literary and cultural history. She stands out as the great exception to the rule that the first-rank poets in premodern China were male. But at what price to our understanding of her as a writer does this distinction come? The Burden of Female Talent challenges conventional modes of thinking about Li Qingzhao as a devoted but often lonely wife and, later, a forlorn widow. By examining manipulations of her image by the critical tradition in later imperial times and into the twentieth century, Ronald C. Egan brings to light the ways in which critics sought to accommodate her to cultural norms, molding her “talent” to make it compatible with ideals of womanly conduct and identity. Contested images of Li, including a heated controversy concerning her remarriage and its implications for her “devotion” to her first husband, reveal the difficulty literary culture has had in coping with this woman of extraordinary conduct and ability. The study ends with a reappraisal of Li’s poetry, freed from the autobiographical and reductive readings that were traditionally imposed on it and which remain standard even today.
learnt a lot from it-very inspirational and well written
评分很comprehensive的研究,前半部就李清照于其时的女性/文人的身份地位出发重新考察了比如自传式书写、《金石录》后序、再婚等等经典问题,颇有新的见解;书的后半部分则关注李清照形象在后世的接受和层累变迁,也很细致。我对这个领域并不了解,但就阅读第一感觉来说,那些被批驳的旧观点自然暴露出男性中心等偏见,但一些revisionist的论点如果实证不足,是否也难脱在女性主义影响下强行修正的嫌疑(比如解读《词论》的地方,Egan对李作为“女性”词人的发言位置的认定在性别上还挺essentialized的,但其实《词论》中李八郎的故事很有强调performance/preemption的灵活机巧的一面)?但也确实因为年代久远,实证难寻了吧。
评分有时身处自己的文化环境反而无法看清事物本质。这个牛逼的外国教授对李清照词从很新颖的角度分析:她一定是在思念赵明诚?她一定是在写自己?男词人在创作时常把自己变成歌女来写,那才高八斗的李清照为何不可?佩服!
评分谢谢彦霄扫描前言与结尾,出国后一定要读完。和中文的清照评传之寻溯系年不同,该书开门见山地质疑了历代传递下来清照作品的真实性。第一部分重构当时的社会环境之于女性作家,强调向来未被重视的"historicized apprehension"。与中文评传相同的是反驳了将清照词作为纯粹的个人抒情来看。作者将李清照再嫁(张汝舟?)并告离视为她创作的一个转折点("writings from aftermath") 7-9章叙述了明清时期妇女写作的更被接受、但同时守贞观念加强- 这两者在清照身上的冲撞所造成的对其scholarship的影响。清照对明诚死后忠贞的寡妇形象,对其再嫁一事的掩盖就是晚清时期渐盛的,紧接着作者叙述五四时期对于此点的争议,并且之后置于全世界的gender dynamic环境中。作者
评分learnt a lot from it-very inspirational and well written
The Burden of Female Talent 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书