Dan Zahavi is Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Subjectivity Research at the University of Copenhagen and the author of Self-Awareness and Alterity and Husserl's Phenomenology.
What is a self? Does it exist in reality or is it a mere social construct—or is it perhaps a neurologically induced illusion? The legitimacy of the concept of the self has been questioned by both neuroscientists and philosophers in recent years. Countering this, in Subjectivity and Selfhood, Dan Zahavi argues that the notion of self is crucial for a proper understanding of consciousness. He investigates the interrelationships of experience, self-awareness, and selfhood, proposing that none of these three notions can be understood in isolation. Any investigation of the self, Zahavi argues, must take the first-person perspective seriously and focus on the experiential givenness of the self. Subjectivity and Selfhood explores a number of phenomenological analyses pertaining to the nature of consciousness, self, and self-experience in light of contemporary discussions in consciousness research.
Philosophical phenomenology—as developed by Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and others—not only addresses crucial issues often absent from current debates over consciousness but also provides a conceptual framework for understanding subjectivity. Zahavi fills the need—given the recent upsurge in theoretical and empirical interest in subjectivity—for an account of the subjective or phenomenal dimension of consciousness that is accessible to researchers and students from a variety of disciplines. His aim is to use phenomenological analyses to clarify issues of central importance to philosophy of mind, cognitive science, developmental psychology, and psychiatry. By engaging in a dialogue with other philosophical and empirical positions, says Zahavi, phenomenology can demonstrate its vitality and contemporary relevance.
發表於2024-12-25
Subjectivity and Selfhood 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
這麼說吧,筆者很自虐地讀瞭英文版,但不覺得寫在英文版那個頁麵一年後會有三人以上閱讀。寫在這裏則很可能會有五人以上。 筆者沒有中文版在手,所以是要翻譯呢,還是要翻譯呢……先鬍亂譯一下,留待各位指正。 1.As Sartre wrote,“reflection has no kind of primacy over t...
評分這麼說吧,筆者很自虐地讀瞭英文版,但不覺得寫在英文版那個頁麵一年後會有三人以上閱讀。寫在這裏則很可能會有五人以上。 筆者沒有中文版在手,所以是要翻譯呢,還是要翻譯呢……先鬍亂譯一下,留待各位指正。 1.As Sartre wrote,“reflection has no kind of primacy over t...
評分這麼說吧,筆者很自虐地讀瞭英文版,但不覺得寫在英文版那個頁麵一年後會有三人以上閱讀。寫在這裏則很可能會有五人以上。 筆者沒有中文版在手,所以是要翻譯呢,還是要翻譯呢……先鬍亂譯一下,留待各位指正。 1.As Sartre wrote,“reflection has no kind of primacy over t...
評分這麼說吧,筆者很自虐地讀瞭英文版,但不覺得寫在英文版那個頁麵一年後會有三人以上閱讀。寫在這裏則很可能會有五人以上。 筆者沒有中文版在手,所以是要翻譯呢,還是要翻譯呢……先鬍亂譯一下,留待各位指正。 1.As Sartre wrote,“reflection has no kind of primacy over t...
評分這麼說吧,筆者很自虐地讀瞭英文版,但不覺得寫在英文版那個頁麵一年後會有三人以上閱讀。寫在這裏則很可能會有五人以上。 筆者沒有中文版在手,所以是要翻譯呢,還是要翻譯呢……先鬍亂譯一下,留待各位指正。 1.As Sartre wrote,“reflection has no kind of primacy over t...
圖書標籤: 現象學 哲學 心靈哲學 Zahavi 現象學運動 主體 自我 phenomenology
學瞭這麼多年哲學不懂鬍塞爾 第六章怎麼看怎麼像hegel
評分Is it possible to specify the nature of this immediate self-givenness any further? Regrettably, Husserl was not forthcoming with details. The terminology used, and the fact that we are confronted with an occurrence by no means initiated, regulated, or controlled by the subject, suggests that we are dealing with a state of pure passivity, with a
評分"The authentic encounter with the other is not perceptual or epistemic,but ethical in nature.It is in the ethical situation where the other questions me and makes ethical demands of me,that is,it is when I have to assume responsibility for the other,that he is present as other.“教練不能這樣若無其事地說齣驚心動魄的話啊。
評分"The authentic encounter with the other is not perceptual or epistemic,but ethical in nature.It is in the ethical situation where the other questions me and makes ethical demands of me,that is,it is when I have to assume responsibility for the other,that he is present as other.“教練不能這樣若無其事地說齣驚心動魄的話啊。
評分經典的關於自我意識的三種分類。zahavi大人的熱點就是清晰!但是對於康德,把自我當成identity,顯然,僅從純批來看,沒有那麼那麼簡單啊!
Subjectivity and Selfhood 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載