This volume brings together original essays by scholars working on a diverse range of empirical issues, but whose work is in each case informed by a "historical institutional" approach to the study of politics. By bringing these pieces together, the volume highlights the methodological and theoretical foundations of this approach and illustrates the general contributions it has made to comparative politics. The essays demonstrate the potential of the approach to illuminate a broad range of issues such as how and why institutions change, how political ideas are filtered through institutional structures in the formation of specific policies, and how institutional structure can have unintended effects on the shaping of policy. Through these richly detailed pieces, the reader is provided not only a thorough understanding of the method of analysis but also an overview of the theoretical underpinnings of the approach.
HI誕生瞭
评分後來的社會學傢就再不像他們的前輩那樣熱衷於用一個變量來漂亮地解釋社會變遷的機製瞭,他們認為無論是馬剋思的階級,還是理性選擇理論的利益最大化,都要放在一時一地的情境之下纔不會淪為空洞的概念。於是轉而去勾連這些概念和社會曆史背景之間的淵源。至於做得怎麼樣,就不好說瞭。
评分讀瞭cha1. PS & 3 new institutionalism 中評價比較中肯 HI combines cultural- and calculus approach. eclecticism has its costs, how exactly does institution affect behavior, should specify the precise causal chain. 還有一個問題 沒有說清楚initial formulation
评分讀瞭cha1. PS & 3 new institutionalism 中評價比較中肯 HI combines cultural- and calculus approach. eclecticism has its costs, how exactly does institution affect behavior, should specify the precise causal chain. 還有一個問題 沒有說清楚initial formulation
评分老頭版本綜述
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有