Daniel Asen is Assistant Professor in the Department of History at Rutgers University, Newark. His published research has investigated the social and cultural contexts of science and medicine in late imperial and twentieth-century China, with attention to transnational and global perspectives. His work has been published in Social History of Medicine and East Asian Science, Technology and Society, as well as within edited volumes on legal history and the history of medicine in China. He is a member of the American Historical Association, the Association for Asian Studies, and the International Society for Chinese Law and History.
In this innovative and engaging history of homicide investigation in Republican Beijing, Daniel Asen explores the transformation of ideas about death in China in the first half of the twentieth century. In this period, those who died violently or under suspicious circumstances constituted a particularly important population of the dead, subject to new claims by police, legal and medical professionals, and a newspaper industry intent on covering urban fatality in sensational detail. Asen examines the process through which imperial China's old tradition of forensic science came to serve the needs of a changing state and society under these dramatically new circumstances. This is a story of the unexpected outcomes and contingencies of modernity, presenting new perspectives on China's transition from empire to modern nation state, competing visions of science and expertise, and the ways in which the meanings of death and dead bodies changed amid China's modern transformation.
發表於2024-12-23
Death in Beijing 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 海外中國研究 醫療史 曆史 城市史 科學史 近代史 謀殺 法律史與法律文化
一些論點非常精彩,比如在第一章中討論到近代國傢如何通過控製death-reporting來實現“死亡”定義的近代轉變,還有後續章節中不斷闡述的法醫專業人士與法律部門官員之間依賴又競爭的關係,以及醫學知識如何被納入司法知識體係中。比較可惜的是,雖然比較全麵地呈現齣近代知識轉型的復雜、多元及非綫性的特點,該書在總的論點上缺乏新意,沒有跳齣近年來學界對於近代科學知識建構討論的總體框架。總之,讀後有一點點小失望。
評分一些論點非常精彩,比如在第一章中討論到近代國傢如何通過控製death-reporting來實現“死亡”定義的近代轉變,還有後續章節中不斷闡述的法醫專業人士與法律部門官員之間依賴又競爭的關係,以及醫學知識如何被納入司法知識體係中。比較可惜的是,雖然比較全麵地呈現齣近代知識轉型的復雜、多元及非綫性的特點,該書在總的論點上缺乏新意,沒有跳齣近年來學界對於近代科學知識建構討論的總體框架。總之,讀後有一點點小失望。
評分法醫史
評分將中國近代法醫學的成立和成熟,放在清末民初西學引進的知識背景之下,從而導緻與其他同時期著作在論述上的略同質化傾嚮。從仵作到法醫,從《洗冤錄》到《法醫學綱要》,中國的傳統道德、醫學、法律、身體及生死觀念都由此發生變化。
評分一些論點非常精彩,比如在第一章中討論到近代國傢如何通過控製death-reporting來實現“死亡”定義的近代轉變,還有後續章節中不斷闡述的法醫專業人士與法律部門官員之間依賴又競爭的關係,以及醫學知識如何被納入司法知識體係中。比較可惜的是,雖然比較全麵地呈現齣近代知識轉型的復雜、多元及非綫性的特點,該書在總的論點上缺乏新意,沒有跳齣近年來學界對於近代科學知識建構討論的總體框架。總之,讀後有一點點小失望。
Death in Beijing 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載