Science in Action pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:Harvard University Press

作者:Bruno Latour

出品人:

页数:288

译者:

出版时间:1988-10-15

价格:GBP 22.95

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780674792913

丛书系列:

图书标签:

Latour
社会学
人类学
STS
Science
科学
Anthropology
社会学|人类学

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

承接住宅自建房室内改造装修设计免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Science and technology have immense authority and influence in our society, yet their working remains little understood. The conventional perception of science in Western societies has been modified in recent years by the work of philosophers, sociologists and historians of science. In this book Bruno Latour brings together these different approaches to provide a lively and challenging analysis of science, demonstrating how social context and technical content are both essential to a proper understanding of scientific activity. Emphasizing that science can only be understood through its practice, the author examines science and technology in action: the role of scientific literature, the activities of laboratories, the institutional context of science in the modern world, and the means by which inventions and discoveries become accepted. From the study of scientific practice he develops an analysis of science as the building of networks. Throughout, Bruno Latour shows how a lively and realistic picture of science in action alters our conception of not only the natural sciences but also the social sciences and the sociology of knowledge in general. This stimulating book, drawing on a wealth of examples from a wide range of scientific activities, will interest all philosophers, sociologists and historians of science, scientists and engineers, and students of the philosophy of social science and the sociology of knowledge.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

一本对“科学超脱性”（detachment of science）进行祛魅的书：1、技术性论文（technical papers）中潜藏的修辞术“使异议者感到孤独”，参考文献的层积化特性使试图反驳的读者仿佛感觉自己面对的是一些成群而来的天才从而羞赧地闭上了嘴。2、实验室中的小九九更不必多说了。3...

评分☆☆☆☆☆