Ming Sing is associate professor at Hong Kong University of Science & Technology. His research interests include include comparative study of democracy and democratization, political culture, civil society, and Hong Kong politics. He has been the author or editor of five books and has published in the Journal of Politics, Journal of Democracy, Democratization, Government and Opposition, Social Indicators Research, among others. He has also been an active commentator on Hong Kong politics, whose comments have been solicited by local and international media.
Ching Kwan Lee is Professor of Sociology at the University of California-Los Angeles. She is author of The Specter of Global China.
发表于2024-11-05
Take Back Our Future 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 香港 社会学 HK 社会运动 李静君 UmbrellaMovement Sociology
In a comprehensive and theoretically novel analysis, Take Back Our Future unveils the causes, processes, and implications of the 2014 seventy-nine-day occupation movement in Hong Kong known as the Umbrella Movement. The essays presented here by a team of experts with deep local knowledge ask: how and why had a world financial center known for its free-wheeling capitalism transformed into a hotbed of mass defiance and civic disobedience?
Take Back Our Future argues that the Umbrella Movement was a response to China's internal colonization strategies—political disenfranchisement, economic subsumption, and identity reengineering—in post-handover Hong Kong. The contributors outline how this historic and transformative movement formulated new cultural categories and narratives, fueled the formation and expansion of civil society organizations and networks both for and against the regime, and spurred the regime's turn to repression and structural closure of dissent. Although the Umbrella Movement was fraught with internal tensions, Take Back Our Future demonstrates that the movement politicized a whole generation of people who had no prior experience in politics, fashioned new subjects and identities, and awakened popular consciousness.
视角相对局限,理论比较陈旧,现象只用事件串联不做解释性研究,社科人文大杂烩,因为仅用俩民意调研数据,或者对比或者相关,也撑不起行动的篇幅。所以才要加点文化进去。解释力度一般。JSTOR可分章下载 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分视角相对局限,理论比较陈旧,现象只用事件串联不做解释性研究,社科人文大杂烩,因为仅用俩民意调研数据,或者对比或者相关,也撑不起行动的篇幅。所以才要加点文化进去。解释力度一般。JSTOR可分章下载 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分视角相对局限,理论比较陈旧,现象只用事件串联不做解释性研究,社科人文大杂烩,因为仅用俩民意调研数据,或者对比或者相关,也撑不起行动的篇幅。所以才要加点文化进去。解释力度一般。JSTOR可分章下载 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分视角相对局限,理论比较陈旧,现象只用事件串联不做解释性研究,社科人文大杂烩,因为仅用俩民意调研数据,或者对比或者相关,也撑不起行动的篇幅。所以才要加点文化进去。解释力度一般。JSTOR可分章下载 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
评分视角相对局限,理论比较陈旧,现象只用事件串联不做解释性研究,社科人文大杂烩,因为仅用俩民意调研数据,或者对比或者相关,也撑不起行动的篇幅。所以才要加点文化进去。解释力度一般。JSTOR可分章下载 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvfc54dj
Take Back Our Future 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书