The ancient Romans changed more than the map of the world when they conquered so much of it; they altered the way historical time itself is marked and understood. In this brilliant, erudite, and exhilarating book Denis Feeney investigates time and its contours as described by the ancient Romans, first as Rome positioned itself in relation to Greece and then as it exerted its influence as a major world power. Feeney welcomes the reader into a world where time was movable and changeable and where simply ascertaining a date required a complex and often contentious cultural narrative. In a style that is lucid, fluent, and graceful, he investigates the pertinent systems, including the Roman calendar (which is still our calendar) and its near perfect method of capturing the progress of natural time; the annual rhythm of consular government; the plotting of sacred time onto sacred space; the forging of chronological links to the past; and, above all, the experience of empire, by which the Romans meshed the city state's concept of time with those of the foreigners they encountered to establish a new worldwide web of time. Because this web of time was Greek before the Romans transformed it, the book is also a remarkable study in the cross-cultural interaction between the Greek and Roman worlds. Feeney's skillful deployment of specialist material is engaging and accessible and ranges from details of the time schemes used by Greeks and Romans to accommodate the Romans' unprecedented rise to world dominance to an edifying discussion of the fixed axis of B.C./A.D., or B.C.E./C.E., and the supposedly objective 'dates' implied. He closely examines the most important of the ancient world's time divisions, that between myth and history, and concludes by demonstrating the impact of the reformed calendar on the way the Romans conceived of time's recurrence. Feeney's achievement is nothing less than the reconstruction of the Roman conception of time, which has the additional effect of transforming the way the way the reader inhabits and experiences time.
發表於2024-11-25
Caesar's Calendar 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: Feeney.Denis 西洋古代 愷撒 古羅馬 Sather
提供的視角很有意思,就是在引用中國紀年的例子時有點問題,雖然年號的方式與B.C或者B.C.E這樣的坐標軸式的方法不同,但是年號背後的乾支紀年法是以60一循環來記錄時間的,最重要的是,雖然我們六十一循環,但是也經常齣現從某到某盡幾年這樣的算法,也就是說B.C以基督齣生為原點,而中國則以,如周之建立,或者漢的建立等等作為原點。我感覺,更有趣的問題是,在以事件來記憶時間的背後,是怎樣的一種人生觀(虛瞭虛瞭????)
評分提供的視角很有意思,就是在引用中國紀年的例子時有點問題,雖然年號的方式與B.C或者B.C.E這樣的坐標軸式的方法不同,但是年號背後的乾支紀年法是以60一循環來記錄時間的,最重要的是,雖然我們六十一循環,但是也經常齣現從某到某盡幾年這樣的算法,也就是說B.C以基督齣生為原點,而中國則以,如周之建立,或者漢的建立等等作為原點。我感覺,更有趣的問題是,在以事件來記憶時間的背後,是怎樣的一種人生觀(虛瞭虛瞭????)
評分提供的視角很有意思,就是在引用中國紀年的例子時有點問題,雖然年號的方式與B.C或者B.C.E這樣的坐標軸式的方法不同,但是年號背後的乾支紀年法是以60一循環來記錄時間的,最重要的是,雖然我們六十一循環,但是也經常齣現從某到某盡幾年這樣的算法,也就是說B.C以基督齣生為原點,而中國則以,如周之建立,或者漢的建立等等作為原點。我感覺,更有趣的問題是,在以事件來記憶時間的背後,是怎樣的一種人生觀(虛瞭虛瞭????)
評分提供的視角很有意思,就是在引用中國紀年的例子時有點問題,雖然年號的方式與B.C或者B.C.E這樣的坐標軸式的方法不同,但是年號背後的乾支紀年法是以60一循環來記錄時間的,最重要的是,雖然我們六十一循環,但是也經常齣現從某到某盡幾年這樣的算法,也就是說B.C以基督齣生為原點,而中國則以,如周之建立,或者漢的建立等等作為原點。我感覺,更有趣的問題是,在以事件來記憶時間的背後,是怎樣的一種人生觀(虛瞭虛瞭????)
評分提供的視角很有意思,就是在引用中國紀年的例子時有點問題,雖然年號的方式與B.C或者B.C.E這樣的坐標軸式的方法不同,但是年號背後的乾支紀年法是以60一循環來記錄時間的,最重要的是,雖然我們六十一循環,但是也經常齣現從某到某盡幾年這樣的算法,也就是說B.C以基督齣生為原點,而中國則以,如周之建立,或者漢的建立等等作為原點。我感覺,更有趣的問題是,在以事件來記憶時間的背後,是怎樣的一種人生觀(虛瞭虛瞭????)
Caesar's Calendar 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載