Jeff Goodwin
Professor of Sociology
New York University
Jeff Goodwin's research interests include social movements, revolutions, and terrorism. He has conducted research in Central America, the Philippines, South Africa, and Ireland as well as in the United States. He earned his BA (1980, Social Studies), MA (1983, Sociology), and PhD (1988, Sociology) at Harvard University.
Professor Goodwin's e-mail address is jeff.goodwin@nyu.edu. His mailing address is Department of Sociology, New York University, 295 Lafayette Street, Room 4115, New York, NY 10012.
No Other Way Out provides a powerful explanation for the emergence of popular revolutionary movements, and the occurrence of actual revolutions, during the Cold War era. This sweeping study ranges from Southeast Asia in the 1940s and 1950s to Central America in the 1970s and 1980s and Eastern Europe in 1989. Goodwin demonstrates how the actions of specific types of authoritarian regimes unwittingly channeled popular resistance into radical and often violent directions. By comparing the historical trajectories of more than a dozen countries, Goodwin also shows how revolutionaries were able to create opportunities for seizing state power.
發表於2024-11-24
No Other Way Out 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
不同於Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提齣的是以State為研究對象的State-centered perspective來研究革命的形成與結果(失敗/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定義來指齣:revolution in fa...
評分不同於Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提齣的是以State為研究對象的State-centered perspective來研究革命的形成與結果(失敗/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定義來指齣:revolution in fa...
評分不同於Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提齣的是以State為研究對象的State-centered perspective來研究革命的形成與結果(失敗/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定義來指齣:revolution in fa...
評分不同於Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提齣的是以State為研究對象的State-centered perspective來研究革命的形成與結果(失敗/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定義來指齣:revolution in fa...
評分不同於Gurr的psychologist approach (individual), Tilly的Contention framework (group), Skocpol的Structure perspective, Goodwin提齣的是以State為研究對象的State-centered perspective來研究革命的形成與結果(失敗/成功)。 用Tilly的革命定義來指齣:revolution in fa...
圖書標籤: 社會運動 比較政治 社會學 政治學 拉美研究 東南亞研究 政治社會學 OperationUranus
豆瓣上居然沒什麼人標這本書...很值得一讀。
評分Chap. 1-4:總覺得理論框架和實際的案例有點脫節,Communist insurgency興起的解釋倒是更和Legacies of colonial rule有關,而不是書中兜售的State-centered perspective
評分Chap. 1-4:總覺得理論框架和實際的案例有點脫節,Communist insurgency興起的解釋倒是更和Legacies of colonial rule有關,而不是書中兜售的State-centered perspective
評分豆瓣上居然沒什麼人標這本書...很值得一讀。
評分國傢中心觀點看待社會運動和革命,認為不同地區革命發生和成功的原因,同特殊國傢和政權組織形式及意識形態所釋放的政治資源、政治機會、社會空間、對反對勢力的態度有關,越是封閉以個人獨裁或小團體裙帶統治、意識形態上敵對和力圖撲滅一切民間社會組織、沒有途徑讓部分反對派精英影響決策進行漸進改革、國傢能力孱弱的國傢,越容易引導民眾不滿情緒導嚮國傢、爆發革命,革命陣營組成越廣泛,革命成功幾率也越大,其餘經濟社會文化等解釋變量都要在政治背景中纔會呈現齣其對革命産生和結果的影響。簡潔的解釋和模型,不過如此一來邏輯上幾乎必然導嚮最終結論:冷戰終結、美國乾預、全球化對威權政體的衝擊和民主政治發展導緻國傢性質和國社關係的轉變,減少瞭革命和激烈社會運動的空間。最近的阿拉伯之春大概可以作為此書理論在中東案例中的驗證
No Other Way Out 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載