Christian Davenport, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Christian Davenport is Professor of Political Science and Faculty Associate at the Center for Political Studies at the University of Michigan, as well as Global Fellow at the Peace Research Institute Oslo. He is the author of State Repression and the Promise of Democratic Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2007) and Media Bias, Perspective and State Repression: The Black Panther Party (Cambridge University Press, 2010), which won an award for the best book in racial politics and social movements from the American Political Science Association. He is the editor of Repression and Mobilization, with Carol Mueller and Hank Johnston (2004), and Paths to State Repression: Human Rights Violations and Contentious Politics (2000).
发表于2024-11-24
How Social Movements Die 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 社会运动 社会学 政治学 政治 social.movement 英文版 自由主义 社会科学
How do social movements die? Some explanations highlight internal factors like factionalization, whereas others stress external factors like repression. Christian Davenport offers an alternative explanation where both factors interact. Drawing on organizational, as well as individual-level, explanations, Davenport argues that social movement death is the outgrowth of a coevolutionary dynamic whereby challengers, influenced by their understanding of what states will do to oppose them, attempt to recruit, motivate, calm, and prepare constituents while governments attempt to hinder all of these processes at the same time. Davenport employs a previously unavailable database that contains information on a black nationalist/secessionist organization, the Republic of New Africa, and the activities of authorities in the U.S. city of Detroit and state and federal authorities.
Revolution ends as an institution,the revolutionary continues.governments might try to kill a revolutionary institution, eliminate some revolutionaries, and modify the revolutionary agenda, but it does not kill the revolution – at least not by itself.
评分1、新非洲共和国,一个目标远大而在策略上弱爆了的运动;2、强调外在因素(国家压迫)和内在因素(重估境况和建立信任)互动对社运消亡的影响;3、材料书写缺乏历史感,理解生硬,但在北美政治科学家里还不算最差的;4、过于强调从反抗者和压迫者所采取的策略来理解成败,忘了什么叫“大势所趋”。
评分1、新非洲共和国,一个目标远大而在策略上弱爆了的运动;2、强调外在因素(国家压迫)和内在因素(重估境况和建立信任)互动对社运消亡的影响;3、材料书写缺乏历史感,理解生硬,但在北美政治科学家里还不算最差的;4、过于强调从反抗者和压迫者所采取的策略来理解成败,忘了什么叫“大势所趋”。
评分1、新非洲共和国,一个目标远大而在策略上弱爆了的运动;2、强调外在因素(国家压迫)和内在因素(重估境况和建立信任)互动对社运消亡的影响;3、材料书写缺乏历史感,理解生硬,但在北美政治科学家里还不算最差的;4、过于强调从反抗者和压迫者所采取的策略来理解成败,忘了什么叫“大势所趋”。
评分Revolution ends as an institution,the revolutionary continues.governments might try to kill a revolutionary institution, eliminate some revolutionaries, and modify the revolutionary agenda, but it does not kill the revolution – at least not by itself.
How Social Movements Die 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书