发表于2024-12-18
Chechnya 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 民族问题 ruspol nationalism conflict chenchnya Ethnic
Chechnya From Nationalism to Jihad James Hughes "James Hughes has produced the most comprehensive, thoroughly documented, and up-to-date study of the Chechen conflict available. This sophisticated and subtle analysis places Chechnya in the context of broader debates about nationalism and ethnic politics, theories of empire and secession, and the propensity of new democracies to go to war."--Matthew Evangelista, Cornell University "Hughes offers a new way of thinking about ethnopolitical conflict by examining conflict dynamics as part of the causation chain in a conflict."--History: Reviews of New Books "Does the book have value for the military historian? Absolutely."--Journal of Military History "an excellent starting point for anyone looking for insight into how the radical Sunni Salafi movement both evolved and commandeered the struggle in Chechnya, which could also serve as an example as to how Al-Qaeda could hijack other nationalist struggles in the future."--International Affairs "An exemplary case study...Throughout, insights into the consequences of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the reconstitution of a federated Russia, and the leadership of Vladimir Putin abound...Highly recommended. "--Choice The sheer scale and brutality of the hostilities between Russia and Chechnya stand out as an exception in the mostly peaceful breakup of the Soviet Union. Chechnya: From Nationalism to Jihad provides a fascinating analysis of the transformation of secular nationalist resistance in a nominally Islamic society into a struggle that is its antithesis, jihad. Hughes locates Chechen nationalism within the wider movement for national self-determination that followed the collapse of the Soviet empire. When negotiations failed in the early 1990s, political violence was instrumentalized to consolidate opposing nationalist visions of state-building in Russia and Chechnya. The resistance in Chechnya also occurred in a regional context where Russian hegemony over the Caucasus, especially the resources of the Caspian basin, was in retreat, and in an international context of rising Islamic radicalism. Alongside Bosnia, Kashmir, and other conflicts, Chechnya became embedded in Osama Bin Laden's repertoire of jihadist rhetoric against the "West." It was not simply Russia's destruction of a nationalist option for Chechnya, or "Wahabbist" infiltration from without, that created the political space for Islamism. Rather, we must look also at how the conflict was fought. The lack of proportionality and discrimination in the use of violence, particularly by Russia, accelerated and intensified the Islamic radicalization and thereby transformed the nature of the conflict. James Hughes is Professor of Comparative Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science. National and Ethnic Conflict in the 21st Century 2007 | 296 pages | 6 x 9 | 5 illus. ISBN 978-0-8122-2030-8 | Paper | $26.50s | GBP17.50 ISBN 978-0-8122-0231-1 | Ebook | $26.5s | GBP17.50 World Rights | Political Science Short copy: The conflict in Chechnya involves many of the most contentious issues in contemporary international politics. By providing us with a persuasive and challenging study, Hughes sets out the indispensable lessons for other conflicts involving the volatile combination of insurgency and counterinsurgency, most notably the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
苏联解体带来legitimacy的困惑成为车臣问题的第一层。实际上车臣在91年之前始终相当平静。法律之后的问题是无论对于俄罗斯还是车臣,独立都带来身份认同上的困境,这从叶利钦后期国内俄罗斯民族沙文主义开始盛行也能看出。同时引发realpolitik的相关问题:杜达耶夫和叶利钦都试图用民族问题作为总统与议会权力争夺的筹码,以致无法有效协商。第一次战争仍非不可挽回,但随后问题恶化使得伊斯兰主义兴起,协商就变得不可能,因世俗权力的领土纷争和宗教领域的哈里发理想已经是两个语境。总的来说是俄罗斯不断用自己的强硬毁坏问题解决的机会,世界体系因顾虑俄罗斯的大国地位而运转失灵,而车臣则因国家机器的弱小崩坏无法获得资源、不能有效进行控制。对恐怖主义的探讨尤为值得关注:很多时候国家才是最大的恐怖主义者。
评分苏联解体带来legitimacy的困惑成为车臣问题的第一层。实际上车臣在91年之前始终相当平静。法律之后的问题是无论对于俄罗斯还是车臣,独立都带来身份认同上的困境,这从叶利钦后期国内俄罗斯民族沙文主义开始盛行也能看出。同时引发realpolitik的相关问题:杜达耶夫和叶利钦都试图用民族问题作为总统与议会权力争夺的筹码,以致无法有效协商。第一次战争仍非不可挽回,但随后问题恶化使得伊斯兰主义兴起,协商就变得不可能,因世俗权力的领土纷争和宗教领域的哈里发理想已经是两个语境。总的来说是俄罗斯不断用自己的强硬毁坏问题解决的机会,世界体系因顾虑俄罗斯的大国地位而运转失灵,而车臣则因国家机器的弱小崩坏无法获得资源、不能有效进行控制。对恐怖主义的探讨尤为值得关注:很多时候国家才是最大的恐怖主义者。
评分苏联解体带来legitimacy的困惑成为车臣问题的第一层。实际上车臣在91年之前始终相当平静。法律之后的问题是无论对于俄罗斯还是车臣,独立都带来身份认同上的困境,这从叶利钦后期国内俄罗斯民族沙文主义开始盛行也能看出。同时引发realpolitik的相关问题:杜达耶夫和叶利钦都试图用民族问题作为总统与议会权力争夺的筹码,以致无法有效协商。第一次战争仍非不可挽回,但随后问题恶化使得伊斯兰主义兴起,协商就变得不可能,因世俗权力的领土纷争和宗教领域的哈里发理想已经是两个语境。总的来说是俄罗斯不断用自己的强硬毁坏问题解决的机会,世界体系因顾虑俄罗斯的大国地位而运转失灵,而车臣则因国家机器的弱小崩坏无法获得资源、不能有效进行控制。对恐怖主义的探讨尤为值得关注:很多时候国家才是最大的恐怖主义者。
评分苏联解体带来legitimacy的困惑成为车臣问题的第一层。实际上车臣在91年之前始终相当平静。法律之后的问题是无论对于俄罗斯还是车臣,独立都带来身份认同上的困境,这从叶利钦后期国内俄罗斯民族沙文主义开始盛行也能看出。同时引发realpolitik的相关问题:杜达耶夫和叶利钦都试图用民族问题作为总统与议会权力争夺的筹码,以致无法有效协商。第一次战争仍非不可挽回,但随后问题恶化使得伊斯兰主义兴起,协商就变得不可能,因世俗权力的领土纷争和宗教领域的哈里发理想已经是两个语境。总的来说是俄罗斯不断用自己的强硬毁坏问题解决的机会,世界体系因顾虑俄罗斯的大国地位而运转失灵,而车臣则因国家机器的弱小崩坏无法获得资源、不能有效进行控制。对恐怖主义的探讨尤为值得关注:很多时候国家才是最大的恐怖主义者。
评分苏联解体带来legitimacy的困惑成为车臣问题的第一层。实际上车臣在91年之前始终相当平静。法律之后的问题是无论对于俄罗斯还是车臣,独立都带来身份认同上的困境,这从叶利钦后期国内俄罗斯民族沙文主义开始盛行也能看出。同时引发realpolitik的相关问题:杜达耶夫和叶利钦都试图用民族问题作为总统与议会权力争夺的筹码,以致无法有效协商。第一次战争仍非不可挽回,但随后问题恶化使得伊斯兰主义兴起,协商就变得不可能,因世俗权力的领土纷争和宗教领域的哈里发理想已经是两个语境。总的来说是俄罗斯不断用自己的强硬毁坏问题解决的机会,世界体系因顾虑俄罗斯的大国地位而运转失灵,而车臣则因国家机器的弱小崩坏无法获得资源、不能有效进行控制。对恐怖主义的探讨尤为值得关注:很多时候国家才是最大的恐怖主义者。
Chechnya 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书