When property rights and environmental legislation clash, what side should the Rule of Law weigh in on? It is from this point that Jeremy Waldron explores the Rule of Law both from an historical perspective - considering the property theory of John Locke - and from the perspective of modern legal controversies. This critical and direct account of the relation between the Rule of Law and the protection of private property criticizes the view - associated with the 'World Bank model' of investor expectations - that a society which fails to protect property rights against legislative restriction is failing to support the Rule of Law. In this book, developed from the 2011 Hamlyn Lectures, Waldron rejects the idea that the Rule of Law privileges property rights over other forms of law and argues instead that the Rule of Law should endorse and applaud the use of legislation to achieve valid social objectives.
具體描述
讀後感
用戶評價
文筆流暢，因為涉及法理，稍有難度，但讀起來很有趣。
评分哈姆林講座三篇，第一篇對洛剋式的納入私有財産權的法治概念的批評，第二篇對實質法治觀的整體質疑，第三篇對立法管製以及立法權的辯護。都是waldron的老話題瞭，不過講座更輕鬆更簡潔。
评分哈姆林講座三篇，第一篇對洛剋式的納入私有財産權的法治概念的批評，第二篇對實質法治觀的整體質疑，第三篇對立法管製以及立法權的辯護。都是waldron的老話題瞭，不過講座更輕鬆更簡潔。
评分哈姆林講座三篇，第一篇對洛剋式的納入私有財産權的法治概念的批評，第二篇對實質法治觀的整體質疑，第三篇對立法管製以及立法權的辯護。都是waldron的老話題瞭，不過講座更輕鬆更簡潔。
评分財産權與法律穩定性的期待之間不存在必然聯係。支持法治的薄概念。但是沃爾德倫的所舉的例子，隻有納入州立法是否違反憲法的角度纔是有道理的。而從個人物權請求權看，得到賠償沒什麼不閤理，因保護公益而給個人帶來的損失不應完全由個人負擔。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有